|
Trips Take Aim at High Health
Costs
By James Warren, Chicago Tribune
staff writer
If you're a multitasker who
inexplicably desires to combine
knee-replacement surgery with a
family vacation to Singapore, or
perhaps twin a heart bypass with
some sun and beach in Costa
Rica, the May issue of Fortune
Small Business will entice as it
unveils the growing,
cost-cutting universe of medical
vacations.
"Jet-Set Surgery" explains why
some (mostly smaller) American
companies are flying employees
overseas for supposedly
high-quality but inexpensive
medical procedures.
Brazil, India, South Africa and
Thailand are other leading
destinations for more than
500,000 U.S. citizens predicted
to leave the country in 2007 for
procedures that include cardiac,
spinal, heart and cosmetic
surgeries, as their employers
(and benefit providers such as
BlueCross BlueShield of Texas)
seek to curb booming medical
costs, notably insurance
premiums.
For example, the average
coronary artery bypass charge is
$75,000 in the U.S., compared
with $11,000 (including
round-trip airfare) at the Fotis
Mahali hospital in India.
A Singapore knee replacement
runs nearly $18,000, or half the
usual U.S. bill. This explains
the growth of middleman firms,
such as GlobalChoice Health Care
of Albuquerque, which teams
employers with foreign doctors.
It finds hospitals, sends
medical records and schedules
the surgeries, along with being
a de facto concierge, handling
air travel, hotel reservations
and sightseeing when desired.
Self-insured companies deal
directly with a firm such as
GlobalChoice to arrange workers'
treatments and travel, while
other employers use it via their
own health insurers.
All this seems to constitute an
emerging footnote to our
inconclusive national debate
over health care, sure to grow
muddier during a presidential
campaign, with the claim here
that "the medical tourism
industry will grow to $40
billion by 2010." That does seem
head-turning. But if temporarily
departing the country can really
determine whether small- and
mid-size employers ultimately
offer insurance or no medical
benefits, maybe more workers
should stock up on sun block and
Fodor's travel guides.
Elsewhere in this issue, it
wonders, "Will Green Play in
Peoria?" as it inspects
aggressive moves by the city of
113,000 to move to an
environmentally based economy
from a heavy-manufacturing one,
replete with ethanol, wind and
other such industries.
Quickly: The spring issue of the
Antioch Review, via Ohio's
Antioch University, explores the
frequently confounding choices
for the world's top writing
award in "The Literary Politics
of the Nobel Prize," with the
basic thesis that a desire for
bland consensus, preference for
work at least translated into
English, search for efforts of
an "idealist tendency"
(according to Alfred Nobel's
testament) and an establishment
leaning explain why "only 17 of
the 103 winners (16.5 percent)
are now recognized as great
authors while 60 percent are no
longer read."
This asserts a bias against
women, Asians and gays amid a
craving for what at a given time
is politically safe, and that as
Rudyard Kipling "was the only
great writer to win between 1901
and 1922,"
Seamus Heaney and V.S. Naipaul
are the only great ones between
1977 and 2006. For sure, it's
head-turning to be reminded that
Tolstoy, Chekov, Thomas Hardy
and Emil Zola didn't win, nor
did the likes of Joseph Conrad,
E.M. Forster, James Joyce,
Robert Frost, Marcel Proust and
W.H. Auden, among many others.
June Atlantic Monthly includes
tech maven James Fallows on
computer programs able to
sharpen how we think and write,
such as the OneNote 2007 tool
from Microsoft allowing one to
file and quickly index PDFs, Web
clippings, audio and video files
for handy retrieval.
The most ambitious gizmo he's
found is Rationale, an "argument
processor" created by an
Australian academic philosopher
that helps to weigh
decision-making via a "logic
map" to analyze assumptions and
competing views. ... U.S. News &
World Report's cover inspects
"Road Warriors," namely most of
us spending way too much time in
traffic and concludes that,
well, there aren't many
appealing fixes on the horizon.
|
|