Subscribe via E-Mail

Get all of our news delivered fresh to your inbox every morning! Just tell us your name and where to send it using the form below.

PS – We hate spam too. We don’t sell or share our list with anyone, and we never send commercial email.




luxe
Friday, January 29th, 2016  |  USD: Buy 531.29 / Sell 543.92
20 years

Lawmaker, Journalists Association condemn union threats against journalists

September 9th, 2015 (ICR News) Libertarian lawmaker, Otto Guevara and Costa Rica’s Association of Journalists (El Co­le­gio de Pe­rio­dis­tas) condemned on Wednesday statements made by ICE union boss, Fabio Chaves threatening journalists with violence during a massive general strike that a number of public sector unions announced for October on Tuesday.

 

In an official statement, the Association of Journalists said that while unions have the right to disagree with the media and the way in which journalists report the news, that any calls for violence against the news media is a despicable strategy to get their point across.

 

“We do not want to even consider that our journalists and communicators are going to feel insecure and fearful while doing their jobs, much less see any of our colleagues attacked by a mob emboldened by the incendiary words of one union leader,” Marlon Mora, president of the Assocation, said.

 

Libertarian lawmaker, Otto Guevara also condemned the threats by Chaves, calling his words “union terrorism.”

 

On Tuesday, public sector union leaders convened a press conference to announce a massive general strike in October, perhaps the largest in decades, during which ICE union boss Fabio Chaves issued a not-so-veiled threat that journalists and the news media could be targeted for acts of violence during demonstrations.

 

Chaves threatened that reporters could face acts of reprisals in the streets if the media doesn’t end what he called a “campaign of demonization against public employees.”

 

During the press conference, organized by union front Patria Justa, Chaves, flanked by Albino Vargas, the secretary general of the National Association of Public and Private Employees (ANEP), said that journalists shouldn’t be surprised if they face acts of aggression in the streets if the media continues to “demonize” public employees through “attacks” on their salaries and benefits.

 

The Solis administration has been under pressure this year to rein in excessively high salaries, benefits and pensions paid to public employees as the country’s fiscal deficit soars.  The media has reported on cases of excessive compensation in recent months, including unskilled laborers, drivers, and secretaries at ICE with salaries of up to ¢3 million per month, and sometimes more.

 

Speaking to a television news reporter for Teletica-7 after the press conference, Vargas said that people could interpret his words “however they please” and said that the media itself would ultimately be to blame for any acts of violence.

 

“We are fed up with you (the media) and your infamous campaign, you (the media) and the ‘right wingers’ will be responsible for anything that happens in this country,” Vargas said.  “Because if we are attacked, we will respond to it, both from a legal point of view but also from a point of view in the streets.”

 

Vargas later told La Nacion that journalists should be “very careful” around crowds of demonstrators if the “aggression of the media continues,” saying that the media are “stoking the fire” of possible violence against themselves.

 

Other union leaders however distanced themselves from Vargas’ rhetoric, with representatives of the dockworkers’ union, (Sintrajap) and the RECOPE (Costa Rica’s state-owned petroleum company) workers’ union saying they would not support any acts of aggression against the press.

 

The unions announced during the press conference a massive general strike in October, saying they would announce the exact date in the coming days.  The general strike is expected to be one of the largest in decades and could potentially paralyze the country, including the country’s ports.

 

Already confirming their participation are the National Association of Public and Private Employees (ANEP), the ICE workers union, the Allied Union of Petroleum and Chemical Workers (SITRAPEQUIA), the National Insurance Institute (INS) workers union (UPINS), the dockworkers’ union known as Sintrajap, the nurses’ union, amongst several others.

 

costa rica news

ATTENTION: If you are seeing this message,


Advertisement


Get our news delivered fresh to your inbox every morning.

Click here to subscribe to our email list. We hate spam too and never send commercial email.

Like us on Facebook and receive our news in your timeline

  • sheldon haseltine

    In most countries intimidation constitutes a criminal offense. The crime of Intimidation is generally defined as follows:[

    (1) A person commits the offense of intimidation when, with the purpose to cause another to perform or to omit the performance of any act, the person communicates to another, under circumstances that reasonably tend to produce a fear that it will be carried out, a threat to perform without lawful authority any of the following acts:

    (a) inflict physical harm on the person threatened or any other person;(b) subject any person to physical confinement or restraint; or(c) commit any felony.

    Here the attack on Daniel Bizier was watched by the police so who knows what the rules are any more? Ann Bender and Jairo Mora would have to agree.

    • Yeims

      I think that right now would be an excellent time to make a strong and lasting example of Fabio to discourage any repeat performances by any more of the union workers.

  • Kennon Gilson
  • Ken Morris

    I am afraid that the best solution to this larger public employees’ union mess is to deny public employees the right to vote.

    So far ordinary Ticos aren’t even paying attention to these union excesses. They aren’t in part because they are so accustomed to union actions that they haven’t noticed how much more strident the public employees’ unions have become. But they also aren’t paying attention because the main politicians calling for their attention are from the far right, and they don’t pay much attention to these politicians to begin with.

    The question then becomes why politicians from the center and left aren’t also bringing the unions’ excesses to public attention. I get it that the left is pro-labor and therefore pro-union, but despite the caricature, leftists aren’t so stupid as to confuse overpaid, bratty public employees with the real exploited labor they want to defend. Neither are centrists. Why are these politicians remaining silent?

    The answer has to be votes. I think unionized public employees make up around 10% of the electorate, but also a portion of the electorate that is more attuned to politics than others. Odds are that they therefore vote in greater numbers than the electorate in general, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they are good for upwards of 15% of all votes cast.

    Well, only rightwing political parties can afford to alienate 15% of the voters. They can afford it because this 15% of the electorate won’t vote for them anyway. Neither center nor left political parties can however afford to risk losing this number of votes. They therefore remain silent about the union excesses.

    The solution may be to vote in the right and crush the unions. There is a remote chance of this happening. If things keep going as they have been, the next election may find the electorate lurching to one or the other extreme. However, a leftward lurch is frankly more likely than a rightward lurch–and we know that the right will lose 15% of the vote off the top from the public employees.

    The better solution is to make relinquishing the right to vote as a condition of public service.

    It’s not actually a bad idea, even one that used to be common among US military officers. The reasoning is that public servants serve the public as a whole, and as such are obligated to refrain from partisan politics as long as they serve.

    Of course, public employees are probably opinion leaders in their families and neighborhoods, so would remain a politically potent force even if they themselves didn’t vote. Nevertheless, eliminating the pressure of catering to 15% of the voters put on center and left politicians would introduce some sanity in the political culture.

    Then again, the way things are going, the public employees’ unions may manage to dig their own political graves while retaining the vote. If they piss off journalists, generally a center-left bunch, they’re daring the center-left to retaliate anyway.

    • Ben

      These PUBLIC SECTOR UNIONS Ken have families to protect and there is alot more than 10% of the Population more like 28%. ICE has 11.000 staff in San Jose alone. Aya has 3000 staff in San Jose. Ken your getting very leftwinger and starting to be a little like Hillary Clinton.

      • Ken Morris

        I will admit that I was guessing that 10% of the workforce is in public sector unions, so taking your criticism far more seriously than it deserved, I quickly googled it and found this:

        http://www.solidaritycenter.org/where-we-work/americas/costa-rica/

        According to it, 91% of 11.5% of the union members in Costa Rica’s workforce are in public sector unions. Doing the math, this comes to around 10.3%.

        If it’s all the same to you, I’ll stand by my 10% guess and pass on your 28% correction.

        I’ll also continue my aversion to wearing pant suits, despite my apparent resemblance to Hillary Clinton.

  • Ben

    Channel 7 has been saying some honest stuff about the public sector unions all week until friday watch its crazy what the public sector unions get for benfits. Costa Rica needs a war I am ready are you expats.

  • Ben

    Feel free to hit a few Costa Rica lawyers they are like the mafia

Popular Content