Subscribe via E-Mail

Get all of our news delivered fresh to your inbox every morning! Just tell us your name and where to send it using the form below.

PS – We hate spam too. We don’t sell or share our list with anyone, and we never send commercial email.




luxe
Friday, January 29th, 2016  |  USD: Buy 531.29 / Sell 543.92
20 years

Business chamber seeks injunction against requirement to provide shareholder information

April 14th, 2015 (InsideCostaRica.com) Costa Rica’s Chamber of Industry (CICR) is seeking an injunction and legal review against a decision by the Directorate General of Taxation (DGT) that forces large companies to provide information on their shareholders to tax authorities.

 

In a press release issued last week, CICR said that the measure, known as the Scheduled and Targeted Multifunctional Analysis Tool (AMPO) “undermines the concept of a corporation and transgresses the limits established by our Constitution.”

 

The resolution, dated July 24th, 2014 requires companies to deliver larges amounts of information about its shareholders through a so-called “analysis tool.”

 

The deadline for submitting the information has been extended twice and is currently set for April 30th.

 

“With this resolution [AMPO], the DGT requires major contributors to deliver [shareholders’] private documentation without an order of court or provision in law,” the chamber’s president, Enrique Egloff, said.  “In addition, the DGT is being granted the power to establish and collect fines without legal backing, leaving the taxpayer with no ability to defend themselves.”

 

“This type of action also affects the business climate in the country, job creation and companies’ productivity,” Egloff said.

 

Egloff said that the chamber agrees with the need for tax authorities to request information from businesses to improve tax controls and compliance, but does not approve of requests for “unnecessary information” or requests that have no “legal basis.”

 

The chamber said it is seeking the injunction due to the “serious damage this requirement could cause businesses.”

 

costa rica news

ATTENTION: If you are seeing this message,


Advertisement


Get our news delivered fresh to your inbox every morning.

Click here to subscribe to our email list. We hate spam too and never send commercial email.

Like us on Facebook and receive our news in your timeline

  • Ken Morris

    As of course you would expect from this outfit. I mean, why on earth would anyone imagine that the owners of corporations ought actually to be identified by name? Isn’t part of business being able to conduct it in secret without anyone knowing who you are? Shame on the rabid socialists for asking that businesspeople be in any way responsible or even identified by name.

Popular Content