Subscribe via E-Mail

Get all of our news delivered fresh to your inbox every morning! Just tell us your name and where to send it using the form below.

PS – We hate spam too. We don’t sell or share our list with anyone, and we never send commercial email.




luxe
Friday, January 29th, 2016  |  USD: Buy 531.29 / Sell 543.92
20 years

Costa Rica leads Latin America in infrastructure investment, but still not enough, says UN

October 15th, 2014 (InsideCostaRica.com) Costa Rica headed the ranking of infrastructure investment by using 5.4% of its GDP on infrastructure projects, followed by Uruguay (5.08%), Nicaragua (4.93%), Bolivia (4.47%), Peru (4.46%), Brazil (4.1%), Mexico (3.32%), Panama (3.32%) and Argentina (2.89%), in a recent report by the United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).

 

However, all of the countries in the region fall short of what ECLAC estimates as the countries’ needs, stating that each country in the report should be spending about 6.2% of its GDP on current and expected infrastructure needs, though this number is “an approximation and not a strict recommendation,” the report concedes.

 



 

Bottoming out the rankings of Latin American nations by infrastructure investment were Chile (2.83%), Colombia (2.45%), El Salvador (2.3%), Ecuador (1.58%), Guatemala (1.55%) and Paraguay (1.51%).

 

As a whole, the region is now spending 3.4% of its combined GDP on infrastructure, an improvement from the 2.7% of GDP seen over the previous decade.  Transport has seen the most significant investment, followed by energy, telecommunications, water and sanitation.

 

“Investment in infrastructure projects contributes to increasing the coverage and quality of public services and reduces the costs associated with mobility and logistics.

 

“This in turn improves the access to markets of goods, services, employment and financing, providing a favorable environment for improvements in the population’s overall well-being,” the report states.

 

 

costa rica news

ATTENTION: If you are seeing this message,


Advertisement


Get our news delivered fresh to your inbox every morning.

Click here to subscribe to our email list. We hate spam too and never send commercial email.

Like us on Facebook and receive our news in your timeline

  • HONEST MAN

    What a joke the UN has no clue. Go to Panama and look around they are fixing there roads and bridges and lots of new housing that is affordable to buy even for low and middle class type people. Costa Rican goverment says they spend on lots of stuff but its BS. UN does nothing and says give us money to throw out the window.

    • SDPUS

      Costa Rica spends the money right into lining the pockets of politicians. Building the infrastructure of political parties like the PLN. If government money is not allocated correctly, it is worthless for societal infrastructure. Governments do not need to spend more, they just need to clean up internal corruption. Spend more, and they will steal more. There needs to be serious consequences for government thieves. The money is there. Just take a look at Tamarindo. A huge tax base for Santa Cruz, but yet the municipality squanders that money, and very little is ever returned to better society. Put government criminals in prison and things will improve.

      • prdatki

        Yes, audit ever person in Government, The ones found guilty of any thing big fines and 20yrs hard labor.

      • HONEST MAN

        Your right. PUT THE PLN EX SCUM IN JAIL

  • Ken Morris

    Hate to add my voice to the chorus of skeptics, but just because CR earmarks 5.4% to infrastructure doesn’t mean it actually goes there. If the UN is using recent data, infrastructure spending includes the trail along the Rio San Juan that wasn’t needed in the first place and from the allocations for which at least $4000 was spent in one evening at a strip club by contractors and politicians.

    • Yeims

      Right! I think that 25% of the funds earmarked for infrastructure are actually spent on that. In fact, this kind of thing has been going on for so many years it wouldn’t surprise me if less than 10% of the funds are actually spent on improving/maintaining the infrastructure. If someone in the know were to indicate that NONE of the funds are actually spent on infrastructure, I wouldn’t doubt it.

Popular Content