Subscribe via E-Mail

Get all of our news delivered fresh to your inbox every morning! Just tell us your name and where to send it using the form below.

PS – We hate spam too. We don’t sell or share our list with anyone, and we never send commercial email.




luxe
Friday, January 29th, 2016  |  USD: Buy 531.29 / Sell 543.92
20 years

Foreigners arrested for ATM ‘skimmer’ fraud, stole thousands from ATM users

Authorities seized cash, skimming devices, and cloned cards. (Photo courtesy of the OIJ)

Authorities seized cash, skimming devices, and cloned cards. (Photo courtesy of the OIJ)

September 8th, 2014 (InsideCostaRica.com) A Czech man and a Romanian man were arrested in raids last Thursday in San Pedro on suspicion of defrauding at least 250 ATM users out of at least ¢110 million (~$207,000) through the use of ATM “skimming” devices.

 

The Criminal Court of Pavas imposed three months of preventive detention on the men on Friday.

 

Authorities were able to seize skimming devices and cloned credit and debit cards in the raids.

 

While not a new problem in Costa Rica, credit and debit card fraud through the use of electronic devices called ‘skimmers’ is becoming ever more common as the skimming devices become ever easier to obtain.

 

The devices do their work after a criminal inserts the thin plastic device into an ATM machine’s card reader.  The device than reads and stores every ATM users’ card information the moment they insert the card into the machine.  The criminal returns later in the day and retrieves the device, which may by then have the full data of hundreds of cards stored on it. That information is later used to create clones of the users’ cards, or for online purchases.

 

Most of the devices allow the ATM machine to function like normal, and as a result many users have no idea that their card information has just been stolen.

 

Inside Costa Rica has warned readers of the scam on several occasions and has received reports from several victims of the scam over the last year.

 

One reader reported to Inside Costa Rica in July that criminals nabbed $600 from her account and $2,000 from two other friends’ accounts using ATM skimming devices, one of which was apparently installed at the Banco Costa Rica branch location in Grecia.

 

Francisco Segura of the Judicial Investigation Organization (OIJ) said last year that many cardholders have no idea that they have become victims, and that many times it is instead the banks that alert judicial authorities to possible fraud.

 

In an operation last year, the OIJ conducted 13 raids in various locations, collecting evidence such as payment receipts, skimming devices, and computers.

 

The skimmers are also sometimes placed in the credit card terminals at retail establishments, restaurants, and other places that accept credit cards.

 

The skimming devices used by criminals can be found for sale on certain web sites in Costa Rica, sometimes carrying a price tag of nearly 1 million colones ($2,000).

 

To avoid becoming the victim of these fraudsters, it is suggested to check closely the area on ATM machines where you insert your card for anything that may look like a hidden our out of place device.

 

 

Image courtesy of Banco de Costa Rica.

Image courtesy of Banco de Costa Rica.

costa rica news

ATTENTION: If you are seeing this message,


Advertisement


Get our news delivered fresh to your inbox every morning.

Click here to subscribe to our email list. We hate spam too and never send commercial email.

Like us on Facebook and receive our news in your timeline

  • Karen Mata

    The CAJA has been skimming permanent resident expats for years now.

    • David Jones

      Don’t pay the CAJA and leave Costa Rica.
      Yo newbies are always complaining.

      • El Torito

        So, your point being…..?

      • Karen Mata

        I bet you were midshipman with Colombus.

        Where does it say I’m a newby?

        You are an old man though, pops.
        What gives? Viagra doesn’t help any more.

        I’ve been transiting the canal since 73, as a service academy middy.

        Wow!! You must have been a pilot. They gave you a shovel and told you where to?

        Moved to CR, in 91, brought the family over in 95.

      • disgusted

        David Jones, I do not think anyone needs to be here 30 plus years to get that CR is closed for business. Looks like Hanes Factory taking your advice and moving to Vietnam. Didn’t the Jockey Factory move there as well? This is going to hurt many families so sad. The Huge mega salaries for Diputados and all the perks has cost the Tico here dearly, in taxes . In 1990 and before many had their own homes free and clear. Now so many do not have this and huge mortagages that they depend on these jobs. David, what is better now than 25 yrs ago?? We should meet and have a local fruit drink and talk about the good ol days. David, Thank you for your service.

    • Ken Morris

      OK, maybe this is a joke, and if so fine, but if you’re serious about the Caja, I suggest that you make an appointment with your insurance rep to find out how much equivalent medical coverage would cost you on the private market (assuming you could buy it without exclusions for pre-existing conditions, which the Caja doesn’t exclude). The Caja is a flat-out bargain for expats, unless I guess they’re stinking rich, and if they are I wonder why they’re living in CR in the first place.

      Now, if you want to change the subject and complain about the runaround and other hassles of the Caja, I’m with you. There are serious problems with it.

      However, bang for the buck, I defy you to find a better deal.

      • Karen Mata

        It’s a one-liner, relax.
        When I choose my medical care though, really not looking for a “flat-out bargain.”
        That “deal” may lead to faulty radiation treatments (as has been a common practice here), long waits for marginal professionals, or a hospital of extreme unsanitary condition.
        Maybe I’ll purchase the bargain brand liquid dish washing soap, but health care, no. I already have very good coverage so why deal with what’s essentially an open ended tax provision? It’s already been subject to a 17% increase as I understand, and tomorrow..??
        While it’s difficult to assess how individuals are responding, I believe the corporate community is speaking loud and clear.
        They’re taking a pass on the CAJA’s, “Wait until we get our Hanes on you.”

        • Ken Morris

          OK, I’m relaxed.

          A problem is that most people can’t afford good coverage, and among these are often Americans. Although I’m sure there are some Americans who pay for quality health care, I’ve frankly never met a single one. Everyone I’ve known in the US who has had good health insurance has had it subsidized by either the US’s “corporate community” or the government.

          Basically, quality health care costs, no matter what country we’re in, and somebody has to pay for it. Moreover, since the costs for any given individual are wildly unpredictable–some won’t ever need to visit a doctor, others may need millions of dollars worth of care–the only way to provide everyone with access in case they need it is either to make sure everyone pays a pro-rated part of the aggregate costs or soak only some people in order to give others a free ride (the US system). In theory CR tries to make everyone pay their fair percentage share, although in practice of course many don’t and there are many free riders.

          I don’t know what the payroll tax for the Caja needs to be, but I do know that a chunk of that payroll tax isn’t even for the healthcare portion of the Caja and that lots of employers as well as individuals aren’t paying it. Herein lies the financial problem.

          My own policy theory is that the Caja should establish the full pro-rated amount that the healthcare really costs, and then offer reductions for low-income folks made up for by general tax revenues. This would end the problem the high income people legitimately experience by having no cap on their Caja taxes. (The US Social Security system has such a cap, and I think it prevents the wealthy from grumbling too much.) It would also alert everyone what the true pro-rated cost of healthcare really is. Right now, I’m pretty sure that not many people have any idea how high this true cost is.

          This said, it is only the financial part, and the Caja has troubles that run deeper than lack of money (although lack of money is a major problem). Based upon my experience, the problems are mostly traceable to the huffy self-importance of the Caja bureaucrats, which a doctor tells me is fueled by the fact that all of them are members of different unions. Medical directors in the Caja actually have no authority over the nurses, orderlies, lab people, or even the janitors. If they can’t get the bureaucrats to work, how the hell can the patients make headway?

          So the anecdotes are legendary. A friend recently saw Caja doctors three times over as many months for stomach problems, and got no treatable diagnosis. I’m no doctor, but told her that it sounded to me like she was pregnant. Sure enough, she was. How can three doctors overlook the obvious?

          Anyway, quality (and efficiency!) definitely need to be improved in the Caja, but it’s the only system most people have in CR. Indeed, although even half of Ticos go private, while lots of corporations have on-site doctors and/or offer private medical insurance, even most of these folks end up in the Caja when they get expensively sick.

          There is no alternative, IMO, to making the Caja work. If this means cutting payroll taxes to encourage compliance, I’m all for that. One tax trick that few people in authority in CR grasp is that you’re better off charging a lower tax that people will pay than a higher tax they will evade. Also, of course, people need to make money before they can pay taxes on it. Governments can tax until they’re blue in the face, but if they don’t simultaneously provide the conditions where people can make the money to pay the taxes, they won’t collect the money.

          Right now, the Caja tends to be good at both ends, so to speak. The EBAIS clinics are actually quite good at managing known chronic conditions, like hypertension, much better than the US is. The hospitals, while a mess, are also very good at fancy surgeries. It’s in the vast middle where the system breaks down–non-emergency surgeries, even pregnancies–and where the bureaucrats give patients the runaround. This needs to be fixed.

          Even so, it astonishes that many expats begrudge paying the Caja a nominal tax. The ARCR even negotiated a tax rate lower than the law call for. Granted, many expats prefer to rely upon some other (usually subsidized) insurance and/or pay to go private, but it’s actually a low cost for what you get.

          One old expat I know gets four times worth of pills more than he pays in Caja taxes every month, and this doesn’t count his myriad tests etc. Heck, a Caja doctor even makes house calls to him. It’s far from the best system, but it’s a bargain–and lots of people don’t have the usually subsidized option to buy the more expensive brand.

      • Likk Mii

        It’s no bargain if you have 3 employees. They cost an extra $450/mo(for caca) and the girl was going to have to wait 2 months for an ultrasound (in bed—kidneys).That cost me another $60.Caja-Caca.

        • Ken Morris

          You know this, but this is exactly where the main treatment problem lies–in the “in between” areas like ultrasounds. Routine and emergency care are usually pretty decent, but anything that requires a non-emergency test or specialist can result in both a long wait and a serious runaround. I myself spent months and wasted five trips to see a dermatologist, only to give up when the clerk simply said that my file was lost and I needed to start over–and then went back to yakking on her personal cellphone.

          A way that many handle this (and you apparently did) is simply to pay out of pocket for the in between stuff. If you can pay for the tests yourself, you can show them to the Caja docs and save some time and anguish. But this does cost some money.

          Whether the cost is too high is a matter of opinion. At $150 per employee, some portion of which I assume is a pension rather than a healthcare tax, the healthcare cost actually remains fairly low–although you do get what you pay for.

          Don’t let me get too personal, but an irony I’ve wondered about is that the Caja may work best for people with chronic conditions. I have one, and as a result the Caja mandates quarterly visits. This gets me in to see a doc every 3 months, and during that same appointment I can usually get any other concern I have addressed (although I believe this violates the Caja rules). This beats lining up at 5 AM. Also, the docs do things like order tests I’m suppose to have annually like 10 months in advance, simply because they know there will be a long delay. Of course, sometimes I just have to pay a damn dermatologist. The Caja-caca isn’t great.

  • disgusted

    Does this kind of banking crime here become international or just CR problem? I wonder how many more of these skimmers are out there waiting?

    Karen Mata, Not only the Caja. You can add transito, airport tax, Border taxes, Rentals, high Power bills, some places no water. We the people have been scalped by the elected officials. Like Pres. Solis said ” chaos unmanageable government and corruption, upon corruption “

    • El Torito

      This is an international crime. I fell victim to it back in Canada 15 years ago. If the ATM portals look a bit different to you, don’t use it. Go inside the bank and use a human, instead.

  • duke ster

    Thank you so much Editor, for posting photos of the device, as we can now watch out for it. A truly clever device I must say. Who would think to pull on the metal face of the bank machine where you enter your card? Now I will, that’s for sure. Thanks again Editor.

  • duke ster

    Some pretty intelligent people joining these discussions I have to say.

Popular Content