Subscribe via E-Mail

Get all of our news delivered fresh to your inbox every morning! Just tell us your name and where to send it using the form below.

PS – We hate spam too. We don’t sell or share our list with anyone, and we never send commercial email.




luxe
Friday, January 29th, 2016  |  USD: Buy 531.29 / Sell 543.92
20 years

Overwhelming UN vote against US embargo of Cuba

300px-United-nations

UNITED NATIONS, October 30, 2013 (AFP) – A record-equalling 188 countries on Tuesday condemned the five-decade-old US embargo against communist Cuba in an annual UN General Assembly vote that signalled hardening opposition to US sanctions.

Only Israel joined the United States in opposing resolution, the smallest number ever. Last year two allies voted with the US government.

Three Pacific island states normally close to the United States — Micronesia, Marshall Islands and Palau — abstained as the barrage of criticism of the embargo reached a new peak in the 22nd annual vote at the UN Assembly.

China, Iran, which has launched a bid to thaw relations with the US administration, Latin American and African nations all publicly condemned the United States.

“The US policy against Cuba is suffering from an absolute international isolation and discredit and lacks every ethical or legal ground,” Cuba’s Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez Parrilla said.

While the United States has eased travel restrictions on Cubans, Parrilla said: “Sanctions remain intact and are being fully implemented.”

Cuba has lost more than $1.1 trillion dollars because of the embargo, according to the minister who told the meeting how the blockade prevents Cuba from getting heart and anti-AIDS drugs for children.

The United States is being used as an “external scapegoat” for the island’s problems, a US diplomat, Ronald Godard, hit back in an address to the meeting.

“Our sanctions policy toward Cuba is just one of the tools in our overall effort to urge respect for the civil and human rights” upheld by the UN, Godard said.

He said that two billion dollars in remittances were sent to Cuba from the United States in 2012 and that the United States is the biggest foreign food supplier to the island.

“The international community cannot in good conscience ignore the ease and frequency with which the Cuban regime silences critics, disrupts peaceful assembly (and), impedes independent journalism,” Godard said in an appeal to other countries to oppose the resolution.

The United States started imposing measures after Fidel Castro seized power in 1959 and nationalized US-owned properties. An official embargo was imposed in 1962.

Envoys from around the world slammed US policy.

Iran called off a diplomatic ceasefire with the United States to condemn the embargo as a “despicable practice.” The blockade “flouts international law,” said Iran’s deputy UN ambassador Hossein Dehghani.

“The call of the international community is getting louder and louder, demanding that the US government change its policy toward Cuba,” China’s deputy UN ambassador Wang Min told the debate.

Bolivia’s UN ambassador Sacha Llorenty Soliz said the embargo was “sullying the history of mankind” and finished his speech with the rallying cry: “Up with Cuba — dear Cuba!”

European nations now oppose the embargo because US legislation even punishes foreign firms that trade with Cuba.

The United States last year eased restrictions on visas for Cubans. The Cuban government has also made travel easier for its nationals.

Cubans have made more than 180,000 trips abroad this year, according to official figures. The US interests section in Havana granted 16,767 visas to Cubans in the first half of 2013, up nearly 80% over the same period in 2012.

Esteban Morales, a Cuban intellectual and specialist on relations with the United States believes the increased travel could be a chink in the armor that could help “end” the embargo.

But other experts say the measures are too timid.

Mavis Anderson of the Latin America Working Group, a non government groups, said that the US administration would have to take a stronger step such as taking Cuba off its list of countries supporting terrorism if it wants better relations.

“The international community believes that Cuba should not be there ,” said Anderson.

costa rica news

ATTENTION: If you are seeing this message,


Advertisement


Get our news delivered fresh to your inbox every morning.

Click here to subscribe to our email list. We hate spam too and never send commercial email.

Like us on Facebook and receive our news in your timeline

  • David Schwartz

    How hypocritical and cynical to embargo Cuba while we trade with the likes of Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and China. For shame!

  • rusty jones

    Cubans in Miami have gotten rich from the embargo

  • Ken Morris

    If the vote were held in Florida, an important swing state in US politics, I’m sure the results would be different. Meanwhile, Cubans are still among the most prevalent immigrants to receive refugee status in the US, which assures continuing Florida support for the embargo.

    Actually, Florida is also the main obstacle to sensible Social Security reform. Perhaps the smartest US move would be to give Florida back to Spain?

    • Jim Freeman

      WOW-Ken you have done it again—Florida to Spain?? I say it again Ken you are just about the smartest person making comments on most every thing! Where did you learn so much and what country is your country of residence?

      • Ken Morris

        Gosh, Jim, I’m hesitant to reply since of course I’m not that smart and can get things wrong, but I’ll go ahead and answer.

        I think I honed what civics skills I have over years of teaching, especially the standard course on social problems. In that course I would assign students articles from both the left and right on various issues, and after awhile you get the hang of the customary ways each camp argues. Of course, you also pick up factual information on a variety of issues, but it’s more important to understand the structure of different lines of reasoning than the facts, since those structures are repeated over and over on different issues with different facts.

        Writing my own books has helped too. I happen to be acquainted with the numbers of immigrants to the US receiving refugee status by country because I looked it up while researching my book about Nicaragua. (Nicas received refugee status easily during the 1980s and still have an easier shot at it than most others.) Having done that, I was attracted to a recent article on the subject that showed Cubans still entering the US at high rates.

        Of course, the Social Security and Florida issue is standard stuff on the topic of the elderly in social problems courses, and it’s even standard stuff in TV political discussions. I don’t really know much about Cuba, but it comes up often in a tangential way in the usual left/right debates, as well as debates about US foreign policy etc.

        Giving Florida back to Spain was a joke, but hey it might please Ticos, since they’d have an easier time getting visas to visit Disney World.

        I am from the US but have permanent legal residency in Costa Rica, so I guess I’m a resident here now.

  • expatin paradise

    I have wondered for decades why the US has continued its cold war with Cuba while extending preferred trade status to much more despicable governments. The US embargo crushed Cuba economically and forced the US to support its own sugar industry to the detriment of the everglades ecosystem. Additionally, while the US has taken an increasingly harder line against illegal aliens, it illogically continues to grant asylum to everyone who drifts onto US shores from Cuba, so that Miami and Dade County, the home of three generations of my (Anglo) family before me, has become one of the largest of Latin American metropolitan areas. I had hoped that the last three Democratic US presidents would normalize relations with Cuba, but have been repeatedly disappointed. Perhaps this action by the UN will be the impetus Obama needs to end this insanity.

Popular Content