Subscribe via E-Mail

Get all of our news delivered fresh to your inbox every morning! Just tell us your name and where to send it using the form below.

PS – We hate spam too. We don’t sell or share our list with anyone, and we never send commercial email.




luxe
Friday, January 29th, 2016  |  USD: Buy 531.29 / Sell 543.92
20 years

Scientists: “Next mass extinction event may have already begun”

October 4th, 2013  (AFP) – Marine scientists warned Thursday that our oceans are declining more rapidly than previously thought — becoming ever warmer and more acidic and losing oxygen at an alarming rate.

“We have been taking the ocean for granted,” states a report that warns of a “deadly trio” of ocean warming, acidification, and oxygen loss.

“We are… exposing organisms to intolerable evolutionary pressure,” it said. “The next mass (species) extinction event may have already begun.”

The scientific review by the International Programme on the State of the Ocean (IPSO) and the International Union for the Conservation of Nature cautioned of unprecedented ocean acidification as humans keep burning oil and coal and pump out carbon dioxide (CO2) — about a third of which is absorbed by the sea.

Today’s rate of carbon release, about 30 gigatonnes of CO2 per year, was at least 10 times faster than that which preceded the last major species extinction on Earth about 55 million years ago, it said.

The level of ocean acidification is unparallelled in at least 300 million years, said the review released just a week after the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change said the ocean was absorbing more than 90 percent of the heat trapped on Earth by greenhouse gas emissions.

The new report said the average upper ocean temperature has increased by 0.6 degrees Celsius (1.08 deg Fahrenheit) over the last 100 years. Further warming will likely cause the disappearance of Arctic summer sea ice, further oxygen depletion and the release of Earth-warming methane trapped in the Arctic seabed.

It also warned of a fast drop in dissolved oxygen in seawater — with predictions of a 1-7 percent decline by 2100 caused by the effects of global warming and nutrient runoff into the sea from agricultural fertilisers and sewage.

“It is the simultaneous occurence of the ‘deadly trio’ of acidification, warming and deoxygenation that is seriously affecting how productive and efficient the ocean is,” said a summary of the reports that make up the review.

“Many organisms will find themselves in unsuitable environments” as the water consistency changes, the number of oxygen-poor “dead zones” increase and coral reefs die off.

This is all happening in marine ecosystems already damaged by human activities like overfishing and pollution, said the document.

Its authors propose urgent interventions: reducing Earth-warming greenhouse gas emissions to make sure we contain the global temperature rise to 2.0 C (3.6 F) over pre-Industrial Revolution levels — a UN target that seems ever more out of reach.

They also called for the elimination of harmful fishing subsidies that drive overexploitation, and banning destructive fishing practices like bottom-trawling that indiscriminately damage the ocean floor and the creatures that live there.

The ocean covers nearly three quarters of the Earth’s surface, provides about half of the oxygen we breathe and feeds billions of people every year.

“The health of the ocean is spiralling downwards far more rapidly than we had thought,” IPSO scientific director Alex Rogers said of the review.

“We are seeing greater change, happening faster, and the effects are more imminent than previously anticipated. The situation should be of the gravest concern to everyone since everyone will be affected by changes in the ability of the ocean to support life on Earth.”

costa rica news

ATTENTION: If you are seeing this message,


Advertisement


Get our news delivered fresh to your inbox every morning.

Click here to subscribe to our email list. We hate spam too and never send commercial email.

Like us on Facebook and receive our news in your timeline

  • Ken Morris

    Yet nobody notices the guilty elephant in the room: cars. Even Al Gore only calls for more energy efficient cars, which won’t help much. Even if emissions for driving can be reduced to zero, the production and disposal of cars pollutes enormously, as also does building, maintaining, and simply having the ever-widening roads. The tragedy is that there are agreeable and affordable alternatives to private passenger motor vehicle transportation, but until these alternatives are pursued all the prattle from the environmentalists is just more hot, polluted air.

    • Jim Freeman

      You certainly are a smart person Ken Morris. Where did you learn so much & do you live in Costa Rica? You always have a comment/opinion.

      • turbooperator

        Not that smart, he obviously knows nothing about the “disposal of cars” , the most recycled consumer product in the US if not the world

    • mhogan

      Yes, what you are proposing is advancement of Agenda 21 where the population will be confined in government approved buildings in areas of population control (red zones-little to no humans allowed; yellow: highly regulated use; turquoise: normal use zones of cooperation (whatever that means); orange: International zones of cooperation; pink: indian reserves; gray: military reservations. Human habitats will be regulated for utility consumption and you’ll be transported on public transport in areas where you are permitted to travel. Forget about adventure or freedom — they’re gone. You can go to and from work, shopping will be within your walking distance and you won’t be allowed to grow or harvest for your own consumption. Sounds like utopia to me. NOT.
      Welcome to the world of ICLEI. Smart indeed, Ken!

  • Mirna

    Breathing is natural. Burning dirty fossil fuels is not. Pollution from dirty energy adds extra carbon dioxide to the atmosphere and warms the planet. http://clmtr.lt/cb/yby

    • mhogan

      “Breathing is natural”. Profound. And to your dismay, consider we exhale carbon dioxide (CO2). We form part of the chain with nature — plants use our carbon dioxide. In fact CO2 is so necessary to man that without it, we would not survive. Maybe you recommend we stop breathing and plants stop growing. You should read studies published by someone other than green romanticists — you may get a broader perspective because I think you’re quite full of it! “Dirty fossil fuels”? Are you aware of the pollution created by production and disposal of alternate energy sources? Obviously not. Just breath natural, Mirna, in a totally blissful world of naiveté. And while you’re at it, consider how the majority of man is going to be able to afford the “alternative”. (e.g. report from Germany: “the rising surcharge placed on German household and SME bills to pay for renewable energy projects” went from .20 per Kwh in year 2000 to 5.277 in 2013. They are changing their policies stressing that clean energy costs have become unacceptable. Let me ask all your “green romanticists” a question: When did the world economy start to decline? — +/-10 years ago, +/-5 years ago? When did the “green” movement gain traction (in Kyoto accord/UN Agenda 21?) Maybe Mirna can afford to pay but the majority cannot. So do you recommend we freeze in the cold, Mirna, because (as is the case is some countries) people are doing that because they can’t afford electricity anymore. And please, read alternate studies which show MMGW is a myth — follow the money!!

Popular Content