Subscribe via E-Mail

Get all of our news delivered fresh to your inbox every morning! Just tell us your name and where to send it using the form below.

PS – We hate spam too. We don’t sell or share our list with anyone, and we never send commercial email.




luxe
Friday, January 29th, 2016  |  USD: Buy 531.29 / Sell 543.92
20 years

In Costa Rica, actor Danny Glover compares Hugo Chavez to Nelson Mandela, says Chavez was his “brother”

Danny-Glover1

August 28th, 2013 (InsideCostaRica.com) In an interview published today by the Spanish-language daily La Nacion, American actor Danny Glover describes former Venezuelan president, Hugo Chavez as his “brother” and compares the former president to leaders like Nelson Mandela.

 

“[Chavez] was not only my friend, he was my brother.  It is difficult for a leader like him to exist in these times.  His vision for humanity and the world I can only compare to leaders like Nelson Mandela.  He was a great man and I cried for his passing,” Glover told La Nacion in an interview in Costa Rica.

 

Glover is in Costa Rica for “Flowers of the African Diaspora” film festival.  Glover is known worldwide for his starring roles in Lethal Weapon and other films.

 

The full interview with Glover can be read here.  (Spanish).

costa rica news

ATTENTION: If you are seeing this message,


Advertisement


Get our news delivered fresh to your inbox every morning.

Click here to subscribe to our email list. We hate spam too and never send commercial email.

Like us on Facebook and receive our news in your timeline

  • prdatki

    Glover at best is a D grade has been ,looking for publisity. Chavez has ruined Venezuela and destroyed it economy.
    Glover should be deported to Africa where he can enjoy living away from the USA.

    • An t-eolaí

      Why ‘Africa’? Is that because he is black? Also, I’m yet to hear of someone being deported to a continent as opposed to a specific country. Chavez was a great man – a great Venezuelan, a great socialist and a great internationalist who applied his unorthodox approaches to defend human rights and help people around the world. Whilst Britain can hardly be called a friend of Latin America, Chavez offered cheap oil to the former mayor of London to help with its hugely expensive public transport system. Like Cuba that offers its world-class healthcare and medical training to its neighbours even though the country is poor itself, Chavez saw that he had to help humanity and was able to use Venezuela’s oil wealth to help him in that quest. It isn’t all about tax dollars/colones/bolívares/etc. Chavez made international friends that have out-lived him and will out-live the oil. With no army, where are your friends should Nicaragua decide to annex parts of your country by force? Your racism, personal and collective, may prove your downfall.

  • disqus_r8w0IwvvLw

    y who destroyed the economy of the usa? Which country is in more debt? Which country has the most enemies? One should not comment unless one’s country has a better track record.

    • Karen M. Mata

      Who saved the world from fascism during WWII, and then rebuilt Europe following it?

      And we can only comment when given your permission. F off.

      • An t-eolaí

        Politics comes in shades. Many people are liberal in some senses and far right or far left in others. You imply that the US saved the world from fascism. I would say it helped save Europe from a particularly nasty form of fascism (to serve its own ends, obviously) but has now imposed a new fascist/economic imperialism on the whole world that is possibly worse. Hitler’s crazy anti-Jew, anti-black, anti-communist, etc. policies were clearly the product of a sick mind. The US, and I refer to it as a gestalt, acts as an extremely intelligent entity that makes cold calculations purely based on its own nefarious wants and needs. Chavez loved his country and did a lot for the poorest among his people. Beyond that, however, he did more than his fair share for the rest of humanity. All America gives the rest of the world, including all of its allies except Israel (for some reason), is war and debt.

        • Ken Morris

          Just want to ratify your posts. Finally something sensible and informed.

        • Karen M. Mata

          The fact that I am here, Jim reflects the serious misgivings I share with you.

  • Karen M. Mata

    Without Mel Gibson, there is no DG.

    Handsome guy though

  • Ken Morris

    Hero worship is a mysterious thing. I tended (emphasis on tended) to support Chavez, but I also found him a mixed bag (with danger in the mix). All leaders are mixed, and I’ve heard scathing criticisms of Mandela too, but I’m afraid that Chavez was more mixed. It concerns me when we get fawning adoration of the guy almost as much as it concerns me when he is regarded as the devil incarnate.

    • An t-eolaí

      I see your point. I have also heard Mandela denounced as a terrorist many times (there is an argument there but, like the the American revolution, Irish Republican Army, French Resistance, etc.,, etc., one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter). Personally, I don’t think Chavez was perfect. My admiration of him is more to do with a mixture of his refreshingly unorthodox style and the way he was prepared to stand up to the US and global capitalism. Pragmatically, I also like Putin. In that case, I think the man seems to be a complete asshole dictator but he offers balance in the world. The US cannot go unchecked in its imperialistic desires because of Russia’s military might (I’m talking here, ultimately, of its huge nuclear arsenal). Likewise, Obama (for whom I once had a lot of respect and in whom I once placed a lot of hope for the world), puts a check on Putin’s excesses outside of his immediate sphere of influence. That contrast sort of shows why I like Chavez so much – he also helped other countries as a friend rather than as a bully who wanted to manipulate/exploit situations. Putin would defend Assad in doing horrid things but encourage him not to do them to save face for Russia. Obama seems intent on helping Al Qaeda in Syria for some reason (certainly not to ‘save lives’ as killing people in an inflammatory way whilst giving a military edge to assholes who want to slaughter random civilians like us is just about the most insane thing imaginable in a scenario in which you truly want to save lives in the long run). He wants to do this even after the lessons of helping them in Afghanistan and even though a NATO-commissioned opinion poll showed that the vast majority of Syrians, Sunnis included, support Assad and hate the Islamists Obama wants to help indirectly). Your huge military needs wars to give it a raison d’etre. Your arms manufacturers need wars to make a profit. The same is true, of course, of Russia. Ultimately, each stops the other messing things up too much. Chavez helped others because, in my opinion, he was a genuinely nice guy with good intentions. That stood him out among world leaders. He was not perfect by any means but, in global politics, everything is relative and he was relatively head and shoulders above everyone else in my honest opinion.

Popular Content