Six Casualties
From Honduras Earthquake
UN Committee Claims Nicaragua's Pro-Life
Laws on Abortion Violate Torture Treaty
Panama Reports 107
AH1N1 Flu Cases
Guatemala Has 6 Cases of AH1N1
UN Committee Claims Nicaragua's Pro-Life
Laws on Abortion Violate Torture Treaty
by Piero Tozzi
(LifeNews.com/CFAM) -- The
United Nations (UN) committee charged with
monitoring compliance with the Convention
Against Torture has declared that
Nicaragua’s full protection of fetal life
violates the country's obligations under the
Convention.
This is the first time this committee has
reviewed Nicaragua since that government
outlawed abortion for any reason three years
ago.
The torture committee is the fourth UN
committee to pressure Nicaragua with respect
to its laws protecting unborn life, joining
the committees charged with monitoring the
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms
of Discrimination Against Women, the
International Covenant on Economic, Social
and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) and the
International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights.
Critics are increasingly concerned with what
they view as the politicization of the
treaty monitoring system by committees
charged with oversight. Neither the
Convention Against Torture nor any other UN
treaty mentions abortion, and it was not
contemplated when such treaties were
negotiated and ratified that countries were
committing themselves to altering domestic
legislation on abortion.
In contrast, the Committee on the
Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD)
has conscientiously construed its mandate as
focusing on actual instances of racial
discrimination. Because of its refusal to
expand its mandate beyond the scope of the
treaty that created it such as by engaging
in abortion advocacy, CERD has been
criticized by some in the human rights
establishment.
Among the human rights lobbyist
organizations that have increasingly lent a
voice to abortion advocacy in the developing
world is Amnesty International, which
abandoned its previous neutrality on the
issue in 2007.
In a shadow briefing to the torture
committee, Amnesty asserted that Nicaragua's
legislation banning all abortions was
equivalent to government commissioned
“torture” or at least “cruel, inhuman and
degrading treatment” banned by the
Convention.
Amnesty also claims that Nicaragua's law
"causes women and girls to die," an
assertion disputed by pro-life critics.
Carlos Polo, Director of Population Research
Institute’s Latin American Office and a
close observer of maternal health
developments in Nicaragua, notes that "the
best indicator of what is happening in any
country regarding bad practices in
gynecological and obstetric services are
rates of maternal mortality." Polo points to
statistics compiled by Nicaragua’s Ministry
of Health showing that maternal deaths have
decreased since Nicaragua tightened its laws
on abortion.
In comparison with Amnesty’s efforts to link
abortion restrictions with maternal death
regardless of what the evidence shows, even
the unambiguously pro-abortion Center for
Reproductive Rights (CRR) has begun to shy
away from making such claims.
In a recent submission to the ICESCR
committee, CRR criticized Brazil for
emphasizing lack of access to abortion as
"the most salient cause" of maternal
mortality, pointing instead to its failure
to provide emergency obstetric care. CRR
went so far as to praise Sri Lanka for
reducing maternal mortality – a country that
CRR elsewhere acknowledges as having one of
the most restrictive abortion laws in the
world.
In addition to Nicaragua, the torture
committee has in the past pressured Chile
and Peru, whose constitutions protect unborn
life.
|
|
|
|
|
