|
OAS gives Ecuador 24 hours to
explain Gutierrez's removal
The Organization of American
States (OAS) Thursday gave the
new government in Ecuador 24
hours to explain how the
Congress concluded that
President Lucio Gutierrez should
be removed from office, the
local press reported.
The request came after Ecuador's
acting representative to the
OAS, Jaime Barberis, told an
emergency session of the
34-nation organization in
Washington that Gutierrez's
removal "was a constitutional
act."
Briefing OAS ambassadors on the
situation in Ecuador, Barberis
said Gutierrez was removed from
office "for dereliction of duty"
and it was "supported by
people."
Barberis also asked the
ambassadors to pass a
"resolution" supporting the new
Ecuadorian government headed by
Alfredo Palacio, who was
Gutierrez's vice president.
In response, Panamanian
ambassador Aristides Royo asked
Ecuador to explain how the
"dereliction of duty" was
determined.
Peruvian Ambassador Alberto
Borea, who is also the president
ofthe Permanent Council of
Ambassadors, said the
inter-American community "cannot
look in a different direction
and say nothing is happening in
Ecuador."
Borea said Gutierrez was still
in the Presidential Residence in
Quito and "giving orders as
president" when a group of
congressmen, all from the
opposition, agreed to oust him
in a meeting held in avenue away
from the seat of the Congress.
The Peruvian ambassador also
noted that the Ecuadorian
congressmen ousted Gutierrez in
a session short of the required
quorum of at least a third of
the total lawmakers.
OAS ambassadors are scheduled to
meet again on Friday to hear
Barberis' explanation from
Ecuador's new government. The
ambassadors who attended
Thursday's meeting did not say
what action they would take if
they find the explanation
unsatisfactory.
According to the 2001
Inter-American Democratic
Charter, it is theoretically
likely to impose sanctions on
Ecuador if the OAS decides that
Gutierrez's removal is
unconstitutional.
Gutierrez, who took office in
January 2003, was the third
Ecuadorian leader forced from
office in the past nine years.
He had faced mounting street
protests against what the
opposition said an illegal
overhaul of the Supreme Court.
|
|