|
ENVIRONMENT-COLOMBIA:
Megaport vs Megadiversity
Constanza
Vieira
LA PLATA, Colombia, (IPS)
- The Colombian government has
chosen the pristine Malaga Bay
on Colombia's Pacific coast,
which draws tourists interested
in whale-watching, for a new
deep sea port.
The bay, located in an area of
enormous biodiversity, has thus
become a new scenario of the
global confrontation between
development and conservation. At
stake is not only a relatively
untouched tropical beach
paradise but also one of the
world's most important breeding
grounds for humpback whales (Megaptera
novaengliae).
Right-wing President Álvaro
Uribe confirmed in late October
that the bay, where as many as
one-quarter of all humpback
whales are born every year, will
be transformed into a deep sea
container port.
The spot chosen is in an area
with one of the highest rainfall
levels in the world. The bay
receives 4.1 million cubic
metres a day of fresh water from
rain as well as the five main
streams that run into it.
"Hub ports" are in vogue today.
They are located at strategic
points on the main maritime
trade routes, as the "hubs" of a
global network of container
ports. Container shipping now
accounts for 60 percent of world
trade by value.
In the deep sea hub ports,
containers are loaded and
unloaded between large ships and
smaller vessels, which operate
at a regional level.
The sheltered Malaga Bay, in the
western province of Valle del
Cauca, is large and deep, and no
rivers run into it. That saves
it from a build-up of sediment,
which would mean high dredging
costs.
It would easily accommodate
post-Panamax ships -- vessels
too big to fit through the locks
of the Panama Canal, which
cannot dock at the Buenaventura
port, 27 nautical miles south of
Malaga Bay.
Buenaventura, which is also in
Valle del Cauca province,
handles 53 percent of Colombia's
foreign trade, and 80 percent of
the country's coffee exports are
shipped out through that port.
The port handles 9,000
containers a day, and has little
room for expansion, while
Colombia's foreign trade is
growing at a rate of seven
percent a year, according to
official figures.
The Sociedad Portuaria de
Buenaventura (SPB) association
estimates that the port will
reach maximum capacity (10.2
million tons a year) by 2010,
while demand will have climbed
to between 22 and 25 million by
2020.
But according to the SPB, the
Buenaventura port and
surrounding area could be
expanded to handle that
capacity, through ambitious
upgrading projects.
However, Malaga Bay has already
been included in the
government's 2005-2006 port
expansion plan as a
high-priority medium-term
question, which was classified
as "urgent" in May 2005.
The idea is to turn Malaga Bay
into a hub port as well as a
multipurpose port facility to
handle all kinds of cargo, like
the Buenaventura port. The first
phase of the project will cost
300 million dollars, according
to the Transport Ministry.
The megaproject will also
include the building of a 204-km
pipeline from Buga, to the east,
with a capacity to transport
40,000 barrels of fuel a day, as
well as an oil terminal for
storing 700,000 barrels of
gasoline and diesel fuel and
40,000 barrels of liquefied gas.
In addition, it will involve the
construction of a highway and a
tourist free zone.
Admission to the global network
of hub ports is not automatic,
but is decided by a handful of
multinational shipping
companies. A World Wildlife Fund
(WWF) report pointed out that in
the region, there are attempts
to convert three ports in
Panama, Manta in Ecuador and
Callao in Peru into hub ports.
But Colombia, the United States'
closest ally in the region,
wants its own modern deep sea
port, while it spearheads a
proposal to create a free trade
bloc among the Latin American
countries with a Pacific
shoreline, from Mexico to Chile.
The question is why Malaga Bay,
instead of Buenaventura?
Malaga Bay "is a militarily
strategic port. Why is it more
important than Buenaventura?
Because they (the government
forces) have military control
over Malaga Bay, but not over
Buenaventura which is surrounded
by rural areas that are
militarily uncontrollable,"
Jimmy Viera, an adviser to
opposition Senator Piedad
Córdoba, told IPS.
The military, backed by
ultra-right paramilitary forces
with close ties to the drug
trade that recently completed a
partial demobilisation process,
have been fighting leftwing
guerrillas in this and other
regions since 1964.
On Oct. 27, 14 hours after the
guerrillas staged an act of
sabotage 27 km from the port,
along the busy road that links
Buenaventura with the rest of
Colombia, IPS saw a semi-truck
that was still smoking and the
burned out shells of two others,
along with four trucks that had
all of their tires slashed,
although traffic was already
circulating again.
Some 2,000 members of the
military and civilians live in
the Pacific Naval Base, compared
to 3,500 people who live in
villages in the area, 90 percent
of whom are black and share a
common traditional culture.
If the deep sea port facilities
are built, many baby whales will
die in collisions with ships as
maritime traffic expands.
Another problem is that noise
affects whales, warned biologist
Patricia Falk with the Yubarta
(Humpback) Foundation, which
reported in October that it is
investigating the cause of the
deaths of six baby and one adult
whale off the Colombian coast.
The humpback whale is listed by
the International Union for the
Conservation of Nature (IUCN) as
"vulnerable," which means it is
not "critically endangered or
endangered but is facing a high
risk of extinction in the wild
in the medium-term future."
Hunting of humpback whales was
banned globally in 1966. But
Japan argues that the number of
ship collisions with humpback
whales show that the population
has recovered sufficiently to
resume hunting.
The impact of the new port will
affect three or four generations
of whales, which would later
seek safer breeding grounds,
said Falk.
That is the fear of Lidia Díaz,
who lives in La Plata, a town on
Malaga Bay that is opposed to
the port. "The whales will not
return, and the tourists will no
longer come to watch them," she
complained.
However, not all local residents
are opposed to the megaproject.
Young people in the beach
villages of Juanchaco and
Ladrilleros, which have
rudimentary tourism industries,
are enthusiastic about the idea,
because a branch of the public
University del Valle is to be
built in the area.
In La Plata, men mainly work as
small fishermen, as their
ancestors have done for hundreds
of years, while women harvest
black conch (Anadara tuberculosa),
a mollusc that lives in the
mangroves and is a delicacy in
Colombia and other Latin
American countries.
But the catch, for both
fishermen and black conch
harvesters, has basically been
cut in half in the last five
years, apparently due to
destruction of the mangroves and
overfishing.
Locals also grow bananas,
sugarcane, yucca (mandioca),
chontaduro (a popular,
nutritious palm fruit that is
cooked and eaten with salt) and
other subsistence products.
"That is our food security,"
said Adolfo Valencia, another
local resident.
"We in La Plata do not agree
with the port, because if it is
built, we will lose all our
economic resources," Ana Paz, a
56-year-old great-grandmother,
told IPS.
And although both International
Labour Convention 169 and the
Colombian constitution state
that affected minority
communities must be previously
consulted on any undertaking
that will affect their
collectively-owned territories,
which are described as
inalienable and free from
embargo, no one has ever asked
the people of this small town,
who dream of making a better
living through ecotourism, about
the projected port.
"Only journalists" have asked,
"even though we will be the most
affected," said a member of the
Community Council of La Plata,
which was founded in 1999 and
has already sent the Environment
Ministry two requests for the
area to be included in the
national park system.
The community's collective title
to the land, which was
officially recognised in 2003,
covers 7,703 hectares. But the
community hopes that in December
it will be granted title to the
entire bay -- a total of 36,600
km.
Ovidio Díaz, Lidia's brother, a
39-year-old fisherman and the
Community Council's coordinator
of "territorial oversight and
vigilance", said "the main thing
is to learn how to negotiate
with the government."
"We know that a lot of fauna
will disappear -- the black
conch, migratory birds, etc. The
highway is going to affect us,"
he said. The question is what
will the Uribe administration
offer to the local communities
in exchange.
|
|