|
GUATEMALA:
Indigenous Groups Sceptical
about Social Dialogue
Alberto
Mendoza
GUATEMALA CITY, (IPS) -
Labour and campesino
organisations in Guatemala are
sceptical of recent government
calls for a formal national
dialogue to address the social
agenda set out in the 1996 peace
accords that officially ended
the country's 36-year civil war.
"The government of Óscar Berger
does not have the necessary
leadership to implement the kind
of national accord it is
proposing," Manuel Pablo Quino,
executive secretary of the
Confederacion General de
Trabajadores de Guatemala (CGTG),
a national labour federation,
told IPS. "The current lack of
governability will hamper the
plan."
Berger plans to initiate a broad
national dialogue on Thursday in
order to make progress towards
commitments contained in the
peace agreements, specifically
focusing on challenges related
to land reform, poverty, health,
indigenous groups and
transparency in government.
The peace accords specifically
outline commitments to respect
indigenous rights, strengthen
the country's democratic
institutions and foster
socioeconomic development in all
areas, including agriculture. A
tax package agreement could also
be on the agenda, as the State
looks for ways to raise the
funds needed to implement
related social and economic
reform.
Representatives from the
country's political, social,
academic and economic sectors,
Congress and the judicial branch
have been called to participate,
although they have yet to
receive official invitations.
Sources in the vice president's
office told IPS that the
proposed national dialogue also
aims to bring Guatemala closer
to meeting the United Nations
Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).
As such, a top priority will be
eradicating poverty, hunger and
systemic social exclusion, which
prevents full participation in
society.
According to Guatemala's
National Statistics Institute,
56 percent of the country's
citizens live below the poverty
line; of these, 15.7 percent
live in extreme poverty.
The vice president's office has
said that indigenous groups -
who officially make up 41
percent of the population -
stand to gain the most from the
proposed national dialogue. A
U.N. Development Programme (UNDP)
report on ethnic diversity found
that more than 80 percent of
indigenous people are
concentrated in the lowest
socioeconomic strata.
Norma Quixtán, the government's
secretary for peace and a
prominent indigenous activist,
reiterated the necessity of
building "a plural and
multilingual State," given that
"racism is still a daily fact of
life."
Ricardo Cajas, who heads the
Presidential Commission Against
Racism, added that "Guatemala
was built on a foundation of
discrimination, and racism still
rears its head in every State
institution."
This comes as no surprise to
anyone, and is backed up by
statistics. Twice as many
indigenous people as members of
other Guatemalan groups live in
extreme poverty. Of the 158
members of Congress, only 12 are
indigenous, and only one of 13
cabinet portfolios - the Culture
Ministry û is headed by an
indigenous person.
Cajas further noted that
indigenous groups are also
excluded from the educational
system, given that it is
"monolingual in areas where the
population is multilingual."
Guatemala's Academia de Lenguas
Mayas (Mayan Language Academy)
estimates that half of
Guatemala's 13 million people
speak at least one of the 22
Mayan languages, but only at
home, because Spanish is
required to gain access to
public services.
Magdalena Pérez, the academy's
Linguistic Planning director,
said that the situation will
only improve "with significant
consciousness-raising among
officials and public employees,
and political will."
In addition to greater social
inclusion, better education and
increased respect for the
culture of indigenous groups,
participants in the national
dialogue are to discuss land
issues and reparations for
victims of the armed conflict.
Rosalina Tuyuc, head of the
National Reparations Commission,
said indigenous populations have
suffered under "policies of
extermination, such as the more
than 200,000 victims of the
armed conflict. The latifundium
[large estate] is one of the
country's major structural
problems, as those who do not
work the land own most of it,
and many of those who do work
the land do not own any," added
Tuyuc, whose background is
Kaqchikel, a Mayan nation.
According to the UNDP report, in
2000 a mere 1.5 percent of the
population controlled 62.5
percent of the land, while 94
percent of property owners held
only 18.6 percent.
Ten years after the signing of
the peace accords, progress has
been slowest in the area of
rural and agrarian issues. The
agreements themselves
established that campesinos must
have access to land to overcome
poverty and marginalisation. In
the wake of various failed
initiatives to redistribute
income and land, this remains
one of the most disputed pending
issues, and one of the most
difficult to accomplish.
The U.N. Food and Agriculture
Organisation (FAO) had
recommended agrarian reform as a
strategy for combating hunger
and meeting the MDGs. However,
two years into President
Berger's term, land
redistribution has not yet made
it onto the agenda.
Rafael González, spokesman for
the Committee for Campesino
Unity, is frustrated that the
government "has left land issues
off the agenda while there have
been more than 75 violent
evictions of campesinos since it
came to power."
On Aug. 31, 2004, an eviction
carried out at the Nueva Linda
estate in Guatemala's western
province of Retalhuleu resulted
in the deaths of nine campesinos,
including three minors, and four
police officers.
As a condition for participating
in the national dialogue,
indigenous and campesino
organisations have demanded that
those responsible for these
crimes be brought to account.
The National Coordinator of
Campesino Organisations has not
confirmed its participation in
the government's proposed
dialogue. The head of the
umbrella group, Carlos Arriaga,
told IPS that "the government is
issuing this invitation after 27
months of ignoring the peace
accords and campesino demands."
On Apr. 20, campesinos, students
and teachers demonstrated
throughout the country and
threatened a national uprising.
Guatemalan Vice President
Eduardo Stein responded with a
promise to create sectoral
roundtables to address their
grievances and demands.
In the eyes of trade unions and
campesino organisations, the
proposed national dialogue is a
concrete fulfilment of that
promise. However, the government
categorically denies that the
initiative is a response to the
protests.
But that may be a moot point;
the national dialogue will go
nowhere if social sectors refuse
to participate.
Guatemalan analyst Víctor
Ferrigno said the process is not
about coming to the negotiating
table with a list of problems,
but rather "meeting to discuss a
political agenda for
implementing solutions with
measurable goals and
indicators."
|
|