News
Home
Page
Costa
Rica
Latin
America
Sections
Special
Reports
Travel/Tourism
Real
Estate
Business
Health
The
Internet
Letters
Opinion
Columnists
Leisure
EroTica
Entertainment
The
Take!
Learn
Spanish
Photos
Editorial
Letters
Opinion
Columnists
Public
Forum
Who We Are
About
Us
Contact Us
Advertise
with us
Subscribe
to our
Newsletter
Links
Page
|
 |
SPECIAL REPORTS
- Wednesday
24 November 2004
<
Back
Send this Page To a Friend |
ENVIRONMENT:
Is Latin America Really a Carbon
Market Pioneer?
María
Amparo Lasso*
MEXICO CITY, (Tierramérica)
- Latin America is a big player
in the world's carbon market:
the region has already
negotiated 210.6 million dollars
of carbon emissions trading in
the context of the Kyoto
Protocol, which is to take
effect in February 2005 and has
rekindled the debate about how
best to fight global warming.
The region's countries presented
46 projects under the treaty's
Clean Development Mechanism (CDM),
which could reduce emissions of
around 55 million tons of carbon
dioxide (CO2), the main
greenhouse gas, produced from
the combustion of fossil fuels.
Latin America, second only to
Asia, is at the forefront of
efforts in the developing world
to reduce greenhouse gases,
which are responsible for global
climate change.
But critics wonder if the Latin
American strategy will foment
cleaner, renewable energy
sources in the region, or if it
will merely be limited to
selling cheap carbon credits to
the highest bidder from the
industrialised North.
The CDM is one of three flexible
mechanisms set up by the 1997
Kyoto Protocol that are designed
to help industrialised countries
meet their goals for curbing
greenhouse gas emissions to 5.2
percent below 1990 levels by the
year 2012.
The mechanism, which began
instrumentation even without the
treaty in force, allows
companies from industrialised
nations to invest in CO2
emission abatement projects in
developing countries.
Through carbon credits, these
companies can count the
emissions reductions as their
own in their countries of
origin, or trade them on the
emissions market.
Such is the case of the
French-German corporation
Vallourec & Mannesmann (V&M),
which plans construction in
Brazil of a thermoelectric plant
to be run on derivatives of
plant carbon produced in
reforestation processes.
The plant will generate
electricity for the V&M steel
factory in Barreiro, in the
southeastern state of Minas
Gerais, and is slated to reduce
emissions of CO2 equivalent by
1.15 million tons in 21 years.
The company will claim that
reduction as its own.
The principal motivation of V&M
''was not environmental, but
rather to limit the risks of
interruption in the supply of
electricity, which is terrible
for the operation of the
furnaces in steel production,''
said Eduardo Botelho, a V&M
operations executive, in a
conversation with Tierramérica.
V&M caused serious ecological
harm in Minas Gerais, recalls
Maria Dalce Ricas, an activist
with the Minas Environmental
Defence Association. ''But about
eight years ago it improved its
environmental policies, and that
is why we are giving a vote of
confidence for the (Barreiro)
project, which is unique because
it uses waste as its raw
material.''
In Latin America, Brazil has the
greatest potential as an
exporter of carbon credits,
followed by Colombia, Panama,
Costa Rica and Peru, according
to a study by the Economic
Commission for Latin America and
the Caribbean (ECLAC). The
document reports there were at
least 46 CDM projects in the
region in March. Several more
entered the application process
in the last few months.
European corporations like V&M
seem to be the most
enthusiastic. From Spain alone,
the companies Endesa, Unión
Fenosa and Iberdrola announced
investments worth 850 dollars in
CDM projects in Latin America.
But the carbon credits derived
from renewable energy projects
represent just 10 percent of all
credits negotiated in the CDM
framework, according to the
non-governmental group CDM
Watch, based in Bali, Indonesia.
And this is the most recurrent
criticism from
environmentalists: so far,
governments and corporations
from the industrialised North
have been using the CDM for
projects that generate large
quantities of cheap carbon
credits, focusing on gases like
methane and hydrofluorocarbons
(particularly HFC-23), which
allows them to quickly and
comfortably meet the Kyoto
Protocol reduction targets.
These are the preferred gases on
the carbon market, which traded
64 million metric tons of CO2
equivalent during the first half
of 2004. The governments of
Japan and the Netherlands, and
the World Bank, are the leading
buyers.
The CDM, say activists, simply
shifts the location where
greenhouse gas reductions are
recorded, without much
environmental or social benefit
for the countries involved, and
they do not promote changes in
energy use and production.
In Colombia, social investment
was a requirement for developing
a wind-energy plant in Jeripachi,
in the Guajira region. It is the
country's first CDM project, of
15 being planned.
The project, which would reduce
emissions worth 3.2 million
dollars in credits, is part of
the World Bank's Community
Development Carbon Fund, and
includes efforts to modernise
school and health infrastructure
to benefit the Wayuú Indians
living in the area.
''When it comes to indigenous
lands, the members of those
communities must be able to
participate as partners'' in CDM
projects, Wilder Guerra, a Wayuú
and director of the Observatory
of the Caribbean, an academic
research centre.
But there are those who see this
type of investment as minor in
the larger context, and argue
that all CDMs should exclusively
involve renewable energy
sources.
However, that is unlikely to
happen, ''because we are in a
transition phase in which we are
also using cleaner fossil
fuels,'' Carlos Loret de Mora,
president of Peru's national
environment commission, CONAM,
told Tierramérica. Peru is
another CDM leader, with 19
projects and investments
totalling 935 million dollars.
On Dec. 1, Peru will sign its
first sale of carbon credits to
the Netherlands, through the
Poechos hydroelectric project in
the northern city of Piura. It
will replace thermoelectric
plants that run on diesel and
coal, and reduce CO2 equivalent
gas emissions by 30,229 tons a
year. The company is required to
provide electricity to the
surrounding community, as well
as other social benefits.
The Spanish energy giant Endesa,
with operations in Argentina,
Peru, Chile and Colombia, will
place on the European carbon
market credits coming from the
planned hydroelectric dam in
Callahuanca, outside Lima, which
will reduce CO2 emissions by
460,000 tons.
''Callahuanca will be completed
despite the uncertainty that
still exists with respect to the
future price per ton of CO2,
which implies a risk. But
interest in obtaining experience
with CDMs has prevailed,'' said
Wilfredo Jara, environment and
sustainable development manager
for the Endesa affiliate in
Chile.
The price per ton of CO2
currently varies between 3.5 and
7.0 dollars -- still considered
quite low. And the transaction
costs reach 200,000 dollars per
project, which does not leave
much room for small-scale
undertakings.
''In Argentina, the costs and
the complexities of presenting a
CDM project have hindered
participation by small and
medium companies,'' Victoria
Baláustegui, of the Argentine
Health Ministry's clean
production division, told
Tierramérica.
And there hasn't been much
interest in Mexico, which,
despite the size of its economy,
has registered just four
projects, all related to the
hydroelectric sector.
The implementation of the Kyoto
Protocol in 2005 could catapult
the Clean Development Mechanism
to the forefront, but its
lifespan could be very short.
The commitments of the treaty
last only until 2012 and,
although new climate talks are
slated for next year, what
happens beyond the Kyoto
Protocol is a great unknown.
(* María Amparo Lasso is
Tierramérica's editorial
director. With reporting by
Mario Osava in Brazil, Abraham
Lama in Peru, and Yadira Ferrer
in Colombia. Originally
published Nov. 20 by Latin
American newspapers that are
part of the Tierramérica
network. Tierramérica is a
specialised news service
produced by IPS with the backing
of the United Nations
Development Programme and the
United Nations Environment
Programme.)
|
|
|
|
|
|