MEXICO:
Freedom of
the Press Is Only Relative in Some States
Diego Cevallos
MEXICO CITY, (IPS) - While the Mexican government boasts that the
country enjoys full freedom of the press, journalists in some states
have to risk their lives to exercise this right.
So far this year alone, four Mexican journalists have been murdered --
either stabbed, shot or tortured to death -- while a great many more
have been threatened and intimidated. The situation has become so
critical that hundreds of Mexican journalists took to the streets in
protest earlier this month.
These threats to freedom of expression have created a state of alarm
among those who work in the media, according to journalists'
associations and others involved in the sector.
There are even some who say that freedom of the press is actually more
limited today, under President Vicente Fox of the conservative National
Action Party (PAN), than it was during successive administrations of the
Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI), which ruled Mexico
uninterruptedly from 1929 to 2000.
Yet the matter has gone completely unnoticed
by the vast majority of the population, since none of the country's
major mainstream media have reported on the situation.
In the meantime, the government continues to repeat that the right
to free expression is fully guaranteed to journalists in Mexico, and
numerous international organisations claim that there is a relative
climate of freedom for the exercise of their profession.
But Mexican journalists themselves disagree. ”The situation of press
freedom is worse under Fox,” Teodoro Rentería, president of the
Federation of Mexican Journalists' Associations (FAPERMEX), which
represents 9,000 of the country's 25,000 journalists, told IPS.
”It's true that journalists can speak out more and denounce things
more than before, but it doesn't really count for much if the
government doesn't pay any attention, and journalists are threatened
for doing it,” he added.
In the three years and 10 months that Fox has been in power, there
have been 10 documented murders of journalists, as compared to 19
during the six-year term of Ernesto Zedillo (1994-2000) and 57 under
Carlos Salinas (1988-1994), both members of the PRI.
The majority of these killings remain unsolved and unpunished,
although numerous investigations have directly implicated former
government officials, police officers and drug traffickers.
Between January 2002 and July 2004, the Mexican National Human
Rights Commission, an independent government agency, received 48
complaints of threats against journalists.
On Oct. 11, in an unprecedented act of protest, scores of Mexican
journalists took to the streets in 10 of Mexico's 32 states to
demand ”guarantees for full freedom of expression and exemplary
punishment for the crimes and attacks against journalists.” A public
declaration was signed by 232 of them.
The government's response to the protest -- sparked by the murders
of four journalists in less than a year -- was to propose the
creation of a working group to study their demands.
Eréndira Cruz, director of the non-governmental National Centre on
Social Communication (CENCOS), told IPS that the media enjoys
greater freedom today than during the years when the PRI was in
power, but at the same time, ”objectively speaking, a state of alarm
and of warning” has been created by the impunity surrounding those
who threaten and kill journalists.
CENCOS joined with other similar organisations and independent
journalists to organise the protest held on Oct. 11, which
ironically was either totally ignored or given minimal coverage by
most of the mass media in Mexico.
A writer with a major Mexican newspaper, who preferred to remain
anonymous, ”so they don't label me as anti-union,” told IPS, ”I'm a
moderately well-informed journalist, and I didn't see anything about
the protest.”
He added, however, that in his view, the events that led to the
demonstration ”are somewhat isolated occurrences. Given all of the
pressures and dangers facing this profession, I would say that there
is in fact freedom of the press in Mexico, because we have won it,
and it isn't in any danger.”
But according to Leonarda Reyes, director of the Centre for
Journalism and Public Ethics (CEPET), the freedom of the press that
exists in Mexico is promoted by the federal government, while there
are individual states ”where it doesn't exist, and that is what
worries us.”
”Mexico is not a single, uniform entity, and there are many
problems, for example, on the northern border (with the United
States), where drug trafficking is a major presence, and a lot of
journalists have begun to practice self-censorship as a way of
ensuring their own survival,” Reyes told IPS.
In the four cases of the journalists killed this year, the available
evidence indicates that their deaths were linked to investigative
work they were carrying out. In addition, all four had reported, in
different ways, that they were being threatened.
Roberto Javier Mora, editor-in-chief of El Mañana, a local newspaper
in Nuevo Laredo, near the U.S. border, was stabbed to death on Mar.
19, while Francisco Ortiz, editor of Zeta, a weekly publication in
Tijuana -- also on the border with the United States -- was gunned
down on Jun. 22. Both murders have been attributed to drug
traffickers.
On Sep. 1, Francisco Arratia Saldierna, a columnist for a number of
newspapers in the Mexican border state of Tamaulipas, was found dead
after having been kidnapped and tortured.
Leodegario Aguilera, editor of the magazine Mundo Político
(Political World) in the state of Guerrero, was kidnapped in May,
and his body was later found dumped in a ditch.
The Inter-American Press Association, a non-profit organisation
which represents newspapers and magazines from Alaska to Patagonia
and is dedicated to defending freedom of expression and of the press
throughout the Americas, expressed its concern to the Mexican
government over these killings and asked for prompt investigations.
A large number of other international organisations devoted to the
freedom of expression and human rights in general have also
publicised and demanded action on these cases.
In response, the Fox government called on the Mexican General
Attorney's Office to investigate the murders, independently of state
police agencies, who are suspected by some journalists' associations
to be involved in the crimes.
Nevertheless, FAPERMEX president Rentería maintains that the
government has yet to adopt any effective action to end the impunity
of those who murder and continue to issue threats against
journalists, and that the situation has actually worsened under the
current administration.
In July, the National Human Rights Commission issued a general
recommendation to the government, with particular emphasis on public
prosecutors and state authorities throughout the country, to bring
an end to the practice of calling on journalists to reveal their
sources, ”as a means of intimidation aimed at inhibiting them from
reporting the news.”
By contrast with Rentería, the directors of CENCOS and CEPET believe
that there is greater press freedom in Mexico today than during the
years of PRI rule, but they warn that the murders of the four
journalists this year demonstrate that these rights are being
weakened.
Similar views have been expressed by international organisations
like Reporters Without Borders and the Latin American Federation of
Journalists (FELAP).
While noting a general improvement in press freedom, they
nonetheless stress that threats continue to be made against
journalists in numerous states, and that some reporters are still
pressured to reveal their sources, while other are sued for alleged
defamation.
Up until the 1980s, most of the media outlets in Mexico expressly
prohibited their reporters from criticising the government and the
PRI, and the editors of most major newspapers were active members of
the ruling party.
|