TECHNOLOGY:
Latin America
Lags in R&D, Despite a Few Success Stories
Mario Osava*
RIO DE JANEIRO, (Tierramérica) - Captopril is a hypertension medication
that brings in billions of dollars a year for the pharmaceutical
industry. Bristol-Myers Squibb holds the patent, but it was Brazilian
doctor Mauricio Rocha e Silva who in 1948 isolated its basic ingredient,
bradicinine, from the venom of the Bothrops jararaca snake.
Researchers at the Autonomous National University of Mexico (UNAM)
discovered that the saliva of the vampire bat is a better
blood-coagulating agent than those existing on the market at the time.
The Germany-based Schering corporation supported the Mexican scientists'
research, but then claimed ownership of the discovery and sold the
patent to Japanese firms, without paying a thing to UNAM.
Among the
region's scientists ''there is a lack of a culture of intellectual
property protection, of registering patents,'' Carlos Vogt, head of
Sao Paulo state's research foundation, a leading Brazilian science
and technology funder, told Tierramérica.
It is essential to overcome this ''cultural blockage'', which is
manifest even when products are developed for the market, says
Eugenius Kaszkurewicz, an adviser to Brazil's Ministry of Science
and Technology.
Alberto Santos Dumont, who Brazil considers the inventor of the
airplane, did not patent his discoveries, unlike his rivals in the
United States, Wilbur and Orville Wright.
But the limited number of innovations and inventions recognised as
Latin American is due largely to deficiencies in other areas.
The figures are discouraging and seem to indicate a gloomy future
for the region: scant investment, a shortage of scientists that has
been aggravated by ''brain drain'', ridiculously low numbers of
national patents and lack of protection for local technologies.
Latin America's lagging behind could have dramatic consequences
because knowledge is a crucial form of capital in the ''new
economy'', agree experts.
The region dedicates just 0.5 percent of its combined gross domestic
product (GDP) to research and development (R&D), compared to 2.5 to
3.0 percent in South Korea, Japan and the United States, a gap that
is reflected in productivity, according to the Economic Commission
for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).
The Santiago-based United Nations regional agency adds that bridging
this gap will require public policies that foment the countries'
innovative capacities.
Latin American investment in this area comes mostly from the public
sector, while in industrialised countries, private companies are the
main source of financing.
In Chile, the state provides 64 percent of total investment in R&D,
20 percent comes from the country's private sector and 15 percent
from foreign investment, according to the Chilean National
Commission on Scientific and Technological Research.
The financial difficulties of the countries themselves often make
the situation worse.
Mexico aims to reach one percent GDP for R&D, an increase from its
current 0.43 percent. In Venezuela, investment in R&D in the past
two years was 0.14 percent GDP. Brazil, which earmarked 1.0 percent
of GDP for R&D in 2000, hopes to double that figure by 2006.
Last year, 24,753 patent applications were filed in Brazil, double
the number in 1990, and 40 percent of the requests were from
Brazilian residents. In Mexico, there were 12,207 patent requests,
but only 468 were from Mexicans.
The major obstacle to greater technological development in the
region is ''the economic model based on cheap labour and the export
of raw materials, in contrast to the Asian model, characterised by
active absorption of technology,'' says Gustavo Biniegra-González,
professor at Mexico's Autonomous Metropolitan University (UAM).
If it continues along its same path, Latin America ''has no
future,'' he said in a conversation with Tierramérica.
The Mexican government ''doesn't know what to do... because the
emergence of China and other Asian countries as assembly plants with
cheap labour and an ability to assimilate advanced technology'' has
surpassed Mexico's capacity to compete in that area, he said.
Biniegra-González predicts a ''disaster of unimaginable
proportions'' for Mexico if it doesn't increase investment in
science and technology, because importing it is currently costing
the country ''more than three, perhaps as much as five percent'' of
GDP.
Mexico has no strategy to overcome dependence on petroleum, which
could run out, he says, within 20 years, nor is there a strategy for
the employment of 20 million small farmers ''who will be made
obsolete due to massive imports of corn from the United States.''
Paying pensions for an aging population requires economic growth of
at least seven percent a year, he adds.
Cuba has an educational level similar to that of industrialised
countries. There are 559 people working in R&D for every 100,000
inhabitants of the island, more than triple the proportion in Brazil
and 2.5 times that of Mexico.
''But the existence of knowledge in itself doesn't in any way
guarantee results,'' warned a Cuban economist who requested
anonymity.
Many obstacles prevent ''the conversion of knowledge into wealth for
society,'' such as an insufficient articulation between R&D and the
productive sector, a scarcity of capital for research, lack of
intellectual property protections and the absence of an integral
strategy, said the source.
Human resources for R&D are lagging behind in other countries. ''In
Venezuela we have 5,688 researchers, but even so we have a deficit
of 12,000,'' according to Ruben Reinoso, training director for the
Ministry of Science and Technology.
In Mexico there is just one R&D scientist per 10,000 people, in
contrast to Germany, where there are 20 per 10,000, and the United
States, 42 per 10,000, according to official figures.
Of the 100,000 Mexicans who received scholarships to study and carry
out R&D in other countries in the past 30 years, six percent
remained abroad. A third of the 1,500 Chilean scientists dedicated
to R&D in 2000 were living in other countries.
But in the Brazilian case, Vogt and Kaszkurewicz point to at least
''three success stories'': agri-business fomented by R&D coming out
of the state-run EMBRAPA, an agricultural research agency; the
internationally competitive aircraft manufactured by EMBRAER; and
the technology for deep sea extraction of petroleum developed by the
government's oil company Petrobrás.
Furthermore, major investment in software development allowed Brazil
to achieve a level similar to India and China in that area, but,
unlike India, it is focused on the domestic market, said Vogt.
Both experts see ''good prospects'' for the future, since the bases
of a broad governmental strategy were established, including funds
for technological development in 14 areas, a new law to protect
inventions, and an industrial policy to stimulate private-sector
investment in technology.
Brazil's ''brain drain'' is less than in other developing countries,
but could become a problem if the greater number of scientists
graduating from university is not accompanied by an expansion of
jobs in that sector.
The state-run universities, which employ most of the researchers,
will have to obtain greater autonomy and organise themselves in
order to create more innovative technologies, while private
companies ''must be bold enough to boost their investment in R&D,''
Vogt said.
Currently, the private sector employs just 11 percent of Brazil's
scientists, and the distance separating it from the universities has
limited the country's technological development and the number of
patents registered, he added.
(* With reporting by Diego Cevallos and Pilar Franco/Mexico, Gustavo
González/Chile, Patricia Grogg/Cuba and Humberto Márquez/Venezuela.
Originally published Jul. 10 by Latin American newspapers that are
part of the Tierramérica network. Tierramérica is a specialised news
service produced by IPS with the backing of the United Nations
Development Programme and the United Nations Environment Programme.)
|