
 |
|
|
|
COLOMBIA:
Decades of War Over
Land
Constanza Vieira
BOGOTA, (IPS) - In Colombia ''it isn't that there are displaced people
because there is war,'' but ''there is war so there will be displaced people,''
says peasant activist Gilma Benítez, unwittingly summing up the conclusion
arrived at by researchers after five decades of armed conflict.
In many rural areas of this South American country, life is measured from war to
war, the first of which broke out in 1948, the second in 1954, the third in 1962
and the fourth, which is still raging, in 1964.
The armed conflicts have all shared a central element: land has violently
changed hands, and hundreds of thousands of peasants have been displaced from
the countryside and forced to flee to towns and cities.
As a result, ''0.4 percent of the population owns 61.7 percent of the best land
in the country,'' Jorge Rojas, director of the Consultancy on Human Rights and
Displacement, told IPS.
According to the local human rights group, since 1985, a total of 3.1 million
people have fled their land, or had it seized from them. The displaced have lost
at least two million hectares in all.
Colombia now has the third largest displaced population in the world, only
surpassed by Sudan and the Congo.
Forced displacement has mainly occurred ''in areas where the land is in dispute,
due to the riches found in the soil or underground, and because of 'megaprojects',''
said Rojas.
Daniel Manrique with the Latin American Institute of Alternative Legal Services
said those who are keen on getting their hands on the land of peasant or
indigenous communities have speculative interests: the property of the victims
of displacement ''is likely to climb in value because it is located in the areas
of influence of transport, agribusiness, tourism, energy or mining megaprojects.''
The war that began in May 1964 produced a rebel army of peasant origin that
defines itself as Communist: the powerful Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia
(FARC), perhaps the world's oldest guerrilla army.
Since its baptism of fire, FARC has been led by former peasant farmer Pedro
Antonio Marín, whose nom de guerre is Manuel Marulanda, and whose enemies have
dubbed him 'Tirofijo' or Sureshot.
''The self-organised and self-led resistance of the potential victims, the
peasants, emerged'' in response to the ''reactionary violence'', Marulanda wrote
in 'Cuadernos de campaña' (journals from the front), published in 1973.
According to those involved in the creation of FARC 40 years ago, peasant
farmers were forced to take up arms to defend themselves against the attacks of
armed gangs created by the land-hungry elites with backing from the State.
The argument that the armed conflict was triggered by rural poverty emerged at a
later date.
Twenty-eight percent of Colombia's 44 million people live in the countryside,
and official statistics indicate that 82 percent of the rural population lives
below the poverty line, including 43 percent living in absolute poverty.
In the first and second armed conflicts, the plight of the peasants ''was truly
appalling. A massacre today, the burning of every house in a village tomorrow,
the members of an entire family taken prisoner and disappearing forever,
insecurity and danger knocking on the door of every shack,'' Marulanda wrote in
his journals. But today's civil war is not much different.
In 1948, the rural population began to be attacked by pro-government armed gangs
that roamed the countryside, sowing terror and seizing the property of peasant
farmers seen as opponents of the government.
''The police and local authorities supported them,'' and the peasants began to
arm themselves with old shotguns and revolvers to repel the attacks, wrote
Marulanda.
The first and second armed conflicts, comprising the period known as 'La
Violencia' (1948-1958), left around 300,000 dead and two million displaced.
FARC is no longer fighting only for the security and safety of rural communities
and legal title deeds to the land worked by peasant farmers. But it does have
an''agrarian programme'', dating back to July 1964, which proposes
''revolutionary land reform that would change the social structure of the
Colombian countryside from the very roots''.
In the third armed conflict, in 1962, the government attempted unsuccessfully to
occupy the remote mountainous region of Marquetalia, in central Colombia --
around 800 sq km of inaccessible cloud forest where a group of peasant families
had cleared land for farming, with the support of the Communist Party.
The families, who described themselves as a movement of rural workers, had asked
the government to build roads and schools in the area, and grant them access to
loans to expand their herds and crops.
During the Cold War, the perception arose that Marquetalia, home to Marulanda
and around 50 families who still held on to their weapons from the period of La
Violencia, was ''the epicentre of the revolution'', in the words of José Joaquín
Matallana, then-commander of a battalion that ended up playing a decisive role
in the final outcome.
On May 18, 1964, some 2,000 soldiers surrounded the peasant enclave, blocking
the entrance of even basic provisions like food and medicine.
Operation Marquetalia lasted three months and formed part of the Latin American
Security Operation, designed and supported by the U.S. military.
The men soon realised that the women, children and elderly could not survive the
siege. They were evacuated from Marquetalia along secret paths on the night of
Jun. 14. Before the families left, they set fire to their own homes.
That marked the end of their civilian lives, although FARC considers May 27,
when Marulanda and his men engaged in fighting for the first time, as its date
of birth.
''Since then, they have spread around the entire country, in mobile guerrilla''
brigades, says rebel spokesman Raúl Reyes.
FARC now has some 30,000 combatants, backed up by 10,000 civilian 'milicianos'
(militia-members), plus 60,000 members of the political wing, the clandestine
Bolivarian Movement, and around two million sympathisers, two-thirds of whom
live in rural areas, a spokesman for the Bolivarian Movement told IPS.
''If the attack on Marquetalia had not been carried out, it is very likely that
FARC would never have been born,'' Jacobo Arenas, one of the movement's Marxist
ideologues, reflected decades later.
In 1984, FARC signed a peace accord with the government, seeking political
recognition of the movement's influence in the regions under its control,
through the creation of the Patriotic Union. The new political party achieved
some success at the polls, but ceased to exist after 3,000 of its leaders were
murdered.
Since 1982, FARC defines itself as a ''people's army'' whose declared aim is to
share power in a government of national reconstruction, after taking part in the
design of a new constitution.
The atrocities committed in the 1940s and 1950s by the semi-official armed bands
known as 'chulavitas' continue to be carried out today by paramilitary groups
that in many regions operate in coordination with the military.
Today's paramilitary militias were set up in the 1980s by local elites, with
army support, and by drug traffickers who owned vast extensions of the best land
in Colombia.
''Around four million hectares are in the hands of drug traffickers,'' out of a
total 45 million hectares of farmland, said Rojas.
A majority of the paramilitaries are grouped in the United Self-Defence Forces
of Colombia (AUC), which have escaped the control of their original promoters.
The government, led by ultra-conservative landowner President Alvaro Uribe, is
currently discussing a ceasefire with the paramilitary umbrella group, in
exchange for guarantees that no legal action will be taken against its leaders.
As in the mid-20th century, the original victims of the aggression, armed
peasant farmers-turned-guerrillas, also wage violence, sometimes with as much
cruelty as their adversaries.
However, the United Nations and leading human rights watchdogs like Amnesty
International and Americas Watch hold the paramilitaries responsible for at
least 80 percent of human rights abuses in Colombia, like the torture and mass
killings of peasant farmers. One common paramilitary technique is to dismember
victims, including women and children, with chainsaws while they are still
alive.
According to human rights lawyer Alirio Uribe, the head of the José Alvear
Restrepo Lawyers Collective, there is no possible military solution for the war,
which ''has stretched on and on with grave consequences, especially for the
civilian population,'' against a backdrop of a growing disregard for
international humanitarian law.
The State ''has been unable to check the expansion of the insurgent groups
through its strategy of strengthening the armed forces and creating and
supporting private armed groups like the paramilitaries,'' he told IPS.
Of the average 100 people who die violent deaths each day in Colombia, five are
killed in combat and 15 are civilians considered enemies or sympathisers of the
adversary and murdered by one of the armed groups.
Another 80 are killed in a context of crime and violence generated by growing
poverty and marginalisation, said Uribe (no relation to the president).
''It would not be enough for the armed groups to stop shooting each other,''
because what is needed is ''a new pact that would guarantee economic, political,
social and environmental rights, as well as the specific rights of women and
children,'' argued the lawyer.
|