<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Johnny Araya considering taking his case to Costa Rica’s highest court</title> <atom:link href="https://insidecostarica.com/2015/04/22/johnny-araya-considering-taking-case-costa-ricas-highest-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://insidecostarica.com/2015/04/22/johnny-araya-considering-taking-case-costa-ricas-highest-court/</link> <description>Costa Rica&#039;s Leading English Language News Source</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 04:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.2</generator> <item><title>By: Ken Morris</title><link>https://insidecostarica.com/2015/04/22/johnny-araya-considering-taking-case-costa-ricas-highest-court/#comment-10980</link> <dc:creator>Ken Morris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 01:38:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidecostarica.com/?p=17568#comment-10980</guid> <description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t imagine that Araya has a constitutional case, since he&#039;s not (as I understand it) banned from political participation.  The courts are merely upholding the party&#039;s right to ban him from running for office on its ticket.  Araya is free to join another party or even start his own and run for office, isn&#039;t he?The stronger constitutional case would seem to be to challenge the prohibition against candidates dropping out of a run-off race.  Shouldn&#039;t  everyone, including politicians, be free to quit whatever they&#039;re doing?  Though I guess Araya wouldn&#039;t get anywhere challenging this.The really strange thing about all this is that Araya apparently believes that he could run for election as mayor and win after losing his party&#039;s support and embarrassing himself nationally.  Even stranger is that he could be right.  Would voters really support this guy now?]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t imagine that Araya has a constitutional case, since he&#8217;s not (as I understand it) banned from political participation.  The courts are merely upholding the party&#8217;s right to ban him from running for office on its ticket.  Araya is free to join another party or even start his own and run for office, isn&#8217;t he?</p><p>The stronger constitutional case would seem to be to challenge the prohibition against candidates dropping out of a run-off race.  Shouldn&#8217;t  everyone, including politicians, be free to quit whatever they&#8217;re doing?  Though I guess Araya wouldn&#8217;t get anywhere challenging this.</p><p>The really strange thing about all this is that Araya apparently believes that he could run for election as mayor and win after losing his party&#8217;s support and embarrassing himself nationally.  Even stranger is that he could be right.  Would voters really support this guy now?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>