<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: New border tax causing chaos at Nicaragua border</title> <atom:link href="https://insidecostarica.com/2013/12/03/new-border-tax-causing-chaos-nicaragua-border/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://insidecostarica.com/2013/12/03/new-border-tax-causing-chaos-nicaragua-border/</link> <description>Costa Rica&#039;s Leading English Language News Source</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 04:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.2</generator> <item><title>By: Jim Obert</title><link>https://insidecostarica.com/2013/12/03/new-border-tax-causing-chaos-nicaragua-border/#comment-6256</link> <dc:creator>Jim Obert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 21:38:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidecostarica.com/?p=12327#comment-6256</guid> <description><![CDATA[Get your facts Straight, after that publication, Jamaica withdrew from the complaint, and the UN general assembly had an official agreement with Nicaragua and Panama.  Colombia did not even bring up the issue as Chinchilla did, and probably does so because she is such an incompetent leader.  The General assembly was AFTER the 13th of September.  Not very smart there, so you might want to try again.  And the ICJ ruled FOR Nicaragua in the Colombia dispute for the waters.   Even the US is respecting this.  Colombia is just pist b/c of the drug money and other income from the Caribbean.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get your facts Straight, after that publication, Jamaica withdrew from the complaint, and the UN general assembly had an official agreement with Nicaragua and Panama.  Colombia did not even bring up the issue as Chinchilla did, and probably does so because she is such an incompetent leader.  The General assembly was AFTER the 13th of September.  Not very smart there, so you might want to try again.  And the ICJ ruled FOR Nicaragua in the Colombia dispute for the waters.   Even the US is respecting this.  Colombia is just pist b/c of the drug money and other income from the Caribbean.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Timothy Williams</title><link>https://insidecostarica.com/2013/12/03/new-border-tax-causing-chaos-nicaragua-border/#comment-6221</link> <dc:creator>Timothy Williams</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 21:19:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidecostarica.com/?p=12327#comment-6221</guid> <description><![CDATA[Marcel, just one correction. The $5 exit tax on the Nica border is being levied by Costa Rica, not Nicaragua.However because of the problems there, they have now temporarily suspended the requirement to prove that you have paid it until they resolve the problems.  We will be publishing a follow up to that tomorrow (the fact that it is temporarily suspended at the Nica border).]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marcel, just one correction. The $5 exit tax on the Nica border is being levied by Costa Rica, not Nicaragua.</p><p>However because of the problems there, they have now temporarily suspended the requirement to prove that you have paid it until they resolve the problems.  We will be publishing a follow up to that tomorrow (the fact that it is temporarily suspended at the Nica border).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Marcel M. Pfister</title><link>https://insidecostarica.com/2013/12/03/new-border-tax-causing-chaos-nicaragua-border/#comment-6219</link> <dc:creator>Marcel M. Pfister</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 21:16:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidecostarica.com/?p=12327#comment-6219</guid> <description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a bloody USD29 departure tax levied by Costa Rica for anybody leaving the country by air. I don&#039;t see any problem with that whatsoever. The USD5 exit tax levied by Nicaragua is completely differente and - poorly implemented.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a bloody USD29 departure tax levied by Costa Rica for anybody leaving the country by air. I don&#8217;t see any problem with that whatsoever. The USD5 exit tax levied by Nicaragua is completely differente and &#8211; poorly implemented.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ken Morris</title><link>https://insidecostarica.com/2013/12/03/new-border-tax-causing-chaos-nicaragua-border/#comment-6218</link> <dc:creator>Ken Morris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 20:43:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidecostarica.com/?p=12327#comment-6218</guid> <description><![CDATA[One of the defining features of totalitarian regimes is that they forbid their subjects to emigrate.  The USSR did this, as also do Cuba and North Korea.  By contrast, so-called democratic countries permit anyone who wants to leave to leave.The nonsense question I ask from Lalaland is at what point an exit tax becomes an effective obstacle to emigration.  Certainly $5 isn&#039;t, but I suspect $10,000 would be.  At issue is therefore the principle of a government levying any fee at all on merely leaving the country.  To be sure, if the fee is earmarked for facilities necessary for boarder crossings, then it would not seem to be an arbitrary obstacle to emigration any more than the cost of a bus ticket is.  However, a tax levied on merely exiting violates the norms adhered to by all so-called free countries.Or, you can look at it this way:  Most slave systems have permitted slaves to buy their freedom.  Since few slaves could afford to do that, they remained slaves.  Is slavery a just system when it allows slaves a buyout provision?I suspect that as a matter of constitutional principle, forcing Ticos to pay the airport exit tax is not constitutional.  I also suspect it violates various international covenants.  Since I believe the $5 land exit tax is earmarked for border improvements, it probably is constitutional, although in practice it looks pretty slimy.Those of is in Lalaland pay attention to principle.  You might want to yourself.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the defining features of totalitarian regimes is that they forbid their subjects to emigrate.  The USSR did this, as also do Cuba and North Korea.  By contrast, so-called democratic countries permit anyone who wants to leave to leave.</p><p>The nonsense question I ask from Lalaland is at what point an exit tax becomes an effective obstacle to emigration.  Certainly $5 isn&#8217;t, but I suspect $10,000 would be.  At issue is therefore the principle of a government levying any fee at all on merely leaving the country.  To be sure, if the fee is earmarked for facilities necessary for boarder crossings, then it would not seem to be an arbitrary obstacle to emigration any more than the cost of a bus ticket is.  However, a tax levied on merely exiting violates the norms adhered to by all so-called free countries.</p><p>Or, you can look at it this way:  Most slave systems have permitted slaves to buy their freedom.  Since few slaves could afford to do that, they remained slaves.  Is slavery a just system when it allows slaves a buyout provision?</p><p>I suspect that as a matter of constitutional principle, forcing Ticos to pay the airport exit tax is not constitutional.  I also suspect it violates various international covenants.  Since I believe the $5 land exit tax is earmarked for border improvements, it probably is constitutional, although in practice it looks pretty slimy.</p><p>Those of is in Lalaland pay attention to principle.  You might want to yourself.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: dark451</title><link>https://insidecostarica.com/2013/12/03/new-border-tax-causing-chaos-nicaragua-border/#comment-6215</link> <dc:creator>dark451</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 18:45:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidecostarica.com/?p=12327#comment-6215</guid> <description><![CDATA[Dear Marcel, I&#039;m not sure why it appears you see red when Nicaragua is mentionned. Here is a note from September 25 from the Panamanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs where they reached an agreement and the issue is no longer after having a chat. As you can see, talking works.http://mire.gob.pa/noticias/2013/09/25/panama-da-por-superado-diferendo-con-nicaraguaHere is an article of Sept 20th from El Espectador, a Colombian newspaper, that says that Jamaica did not endorse politically the Colombian, Costa Rican and Panamanian position.http://www.elespectador.com/noticias/elmundo/colombia-entregara-el-lunes-onu-denuncia-contra-nicarag-articulo-447736Again, talking works. Whining doesnt.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Marcel, I&#8217;m not sure why it appears you see red when Nicaragua is mentionned. Here is a note from September 25 from the Panamanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs where they reached an agreement and the issue is no longer after having a chat. As you can see, talking works.</p><p><a href="http://mire.gob.pa/noticias/2013/09/25/panama-da-por-superado-diferendo-con-nicaragua" rel="nofollow">http://mire.gob.pa/noticias/2013/09/25/panama-da-por-superado-diferendo-con-nicaragua</a></p><p>Here is an article of Sept 20th from El Espectador, a Colombian newspaper, that says that Jamaica did not endorse politically the Colombian, Costa Rican and Panamanian position.</p><p><a href="http://www.elespectador.com/noticias/elmundo/colombia-entregara-el-lunes-onu-denuncia-contra-nicarag-articulo-447736" rel="nofollow">http://www.elespectador.com/noticias/elmundo/colombia-entregara-el-lunes-onu-denuncia-contra-nicarag-articulo-447736</a></p><p>Again, talking works. Whining doesnt.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Marcel M. Pfister</title><link>https://insidecostarica.com/2013/12/03/new-border-tax-causing-chaos-nicaragua-border/#comment-6207</link> <dc:creator>Marcel M. Pfister</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 15:04:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidecostarica.com/?p=12327#comment-6207</guid> <description><![CDATA[Wrong again. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS TIMES. September 13, 2013: Panama joins Colombia, Costa Rica and jamaica in the Regional Fight with Nicaragua over Regional Waters. GLOBAL VOICES: Russian Warships in Nicaragua Rekindle Territorial Disputes.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong again. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS TIMES. September 13, 2013: Panama joins Colombia, Costa Rica and jamaica in the Regional Fight with Nicaragua over Regional Waters. GLOBAL VOICES: Russian Warships in Nicaragua Rekindle Territorial Disputes.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Marcel M. Pfister</title><link>https://insidecostarica.com/2013/12/03/new-border-tax-causing-chaos-nicaragua-border/#comment-6206</link> <dc:creator>Marcel M. Pfister</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidecostarica.com/?p=12327#comment-6206</guid> <description><![CDATA[This is - of course - a heap of absolute nonsense. What does an exit tax levied by Costa Rica have to do with - of all places - North Korea and Cuba? You seem to be living in Lalaland.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is &#8211; of course &#8211; a heap of absolute nonsense. What does an exit tax levied by Costa Rica have to do with &#8211; of all places &#8211; North Korea and Cuba? You seem to be living in Lalaland.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmy Kirk</title><link>https://insidecostarica.com/2013/12/03/new-border-tax-causing-chaos-nicaragua-border/#comment-6199</link> <dc:creator>Jimmy Kirk</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidecostarica.com/?p=12327#comment-6199</guid> <description><![CDATA[Been living here for three years now, so yes, I have become accustomed to the way things are done. I was relating a summation of the major things over the last three years. My residency is filed and hope to have it approved soon so I do not have to do the border shuffle anymore.Overall, I rate the lifestyle here very good after visiting Mexico, Panama and Nicaragua, I chose Costa Rica as my new home for many good reasons. I do help with support of my new family of relatives here as well as many neighbors that are in need. This is a place that the taxes collected should be used instead of lining the pockets of the political powers. With much of the people here living in poverty, it is shameful to see how they are treated, so I do what I can to be helpful even to the point of buying a lot of crap I do not need because that sale may feed a family of 6 or more for a week.Even though there are many things I would like to see changed within the infrastructure, the quality of life is great and most people are basically honest here. I did already obtain a bank account here and no problem with that part, so I have tried to anticipate and resolve any and all known issues beforehand. It is just the ones that change without notice that are irritating, such as the land exit fee, which I read was repealed until machines can be installed at the borders. Have a great day.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been living here for three years now, so yes, I have become accustomed to the way things are done. I was relating a summation of the major things over the last three years. My residency is filed and hope to have it approved soon so I do not have to do the border shuffle anymore.</p><p>Overall, I rate the lifestyle here very good after visiting Mexico, Panama and Nicaragua, I chose Costa Rica as my new home for many good reasons. I do help with support of my new family of relatives here as well as many neighbors that are in need. This is a place that the taxes collected should be used instead of lining the pockets of the political powers. With much of the people here living in poverty, it is shameful to see how they are treated, so I do what I can to be helpful even to the point of buying a lot of crap I do not need because that sale may feed a family of 6 or more for a week.</p><p>Even though there are many things I would like to see changed within the infrastructure, the quality of life is great and most people are basically honest here.<br /> I did already obtain a bank account here and no problem with that part, so I have tried to anticipate and resolve any and all known issues beforehand. It is just the ones that change without notice that are irritating, such as the land exit fee, which I read was repealed until machines can be installed at the borders.<br /> Have a great day.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ken Morris</title><link>https://insidecostarica.com/2013/12/03/new-border-tax-causing-chaos-nicaragua-border/#comment-6196</link> <dc:creator>Ken Morris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidecostarica.com/?p=12327#comment-6196</guid> <description><![CDATA[I just checked the site myself and sure enough you are correct.  I was misinformed by the person I asked.  (I asked right after I acquired residency and was surprised to still have to pay the exit tax.  The clerk told me that I needed to have a Costa Rica passport to avoid the tax.  Clearly the clerk was wrong.)]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just checked the site myself and sure enough you are correct.  I was misinformed by the person I asked.  (I asked right after I acquired residency and was surprised to still have to pay the exit tax.  The clerk told me that I needed to have a Costa Rica passport to avoid the tax.  Clearly the clerk was wrong.)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: turbooperator</title><link>https://insidecostarica.com/2013/12/03/new-border-tax-causing-chaos-nicaragua-border/#comment-6194</link> <dc:creator>turbooperator</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 17:54:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidecostarica.com/?p=12327#comment-6194</guid> <description><![CDATA[I know this because my wife is Costa Rican. And from the SJO site:&quot;Debe cancelar el impuesto de salida del país, por un monto de $29. Aplica para nacionales y extranjeros, niños y adultos.&quot; I have read in the spanish language news that the land exit tax also applies to all (nacionales y extranjeros) who exit. This is supposedly earmarked for border crossing facility improvements.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this because my wife is Costa Rican. And from the SJO site:&#8221;Debe cancelar el impuesto de salida del país, por un monto de $29. Aplica para nacionales y extranjeros, niños y adultos.&#8221; I have read in the spanish language news that the land exit tax also applies to all (nacionales y extranjeros) who exit. This is supposedly earmarked for border crossing facility improvements.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>