<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: CR insurers soon to be required to provide coverage to those over 65 years of age</title> <atom:link href="https://insidecostarica.com/2013/07/15/cr-insurers-soon-to-be-required-to-provide-coverage-to-those-over-65-years-of-age/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>https://insidecostarica.com/2013/07/15/cr-insurers-soon-to-be-required-to-provide-coverage-to-those-over-65-years-of-age/</link> <description>Costa Rica&#039;s Leading English Language News Source</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 04:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.2</generator> <item><title>By: Ken Morris</title><link>https://insidecostarica.com/2013/07/15/cr-insurers-soon-to-be-required-to-provide-coverage-to-those-over-65-years-of-age/#comment-4959</link> <dc:creator>Ken Morris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2013 04:48:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidecostarica.com/?p=9731#comment-4959</guid> <description><![CDATA[OMG, does the court not understand insurance?  There&#039;s a reason insurance terminates after a certain age, duh, actuarial.  I guess though the insurance companies can simply increase their premiums, charging like $5000 a month for a $5000 life insurance policy, and get people to voluntarily end coverage.  I often wonder what the hell the court is thinking.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG, does the court not understand insurance?  There&#8217;s a reason insurance terminates after a certain age, duh, actuarial.  I guess though the insurance companies can simply increase their premiums, charging like $5000 a month for a $5000 life insurance policy, and get people to voluntarily end coverage.  I often wonder what the hell the court is thinking.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mhogan</title><link>https://insidecostarica.com/2013/07/15/cr-insurers-soon-to-be-required-to-provide-coverage-to-those-over-65-years-of-age/#comment-4954</link> <dc:creator>mhogan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidecostarica.com/?p=9731#comment-4954</guid> <description><![CDATA[Strange thing is that our INS private insurance went from a little over $3000 a year to over $5000 a year once my husband and I reached 65.  So if they are talking about &quot;an increase in premiums&quot;, just exactly what does that mean?  A $2000 a year ripoff for husband and wife seems like an increase to me.  &quot;A rose by any other name is still a rose&quot; -- maybe SUG should look into this practice of discriminating against the aged as well.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange thing is that our INS private insurance went from a little over $3000 a year to over $5000 a year once my husband and I reached 65.  So if they are talking about &#8220;an increase in premiums&#8221;, just exactly what does that mean?  A $2000 a year ripoff for husband and wife seems like an increase to me.  &#8220;A rose by any other name is still a rose&#8221; &#8212; maybe SUG should look into this practice of discriminating against the aged as well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>