
 |
RIGHTS-BRAZIL:
For Indians, Land Is
Life Itself
Mario Osava
RIO DE JANEIRO, (IPS) - Land represents the work of a lifetime for some;
for others, it is life itself. For that reason, death is always a possibility in
the property disputes between landowners and indigenous people that frequently
occur in many parts of Brazil.
The latest outbreak of tension and warnings of bloodshed have occurred in the
southwestern state of Mato Grosso do Sul, near the Paraguayan border, where just
before Christmas, some 3,000 Guarani Indians invaded 14 ranches that they claim
as part of their ancestral land.
In negotiations brokered by the National Indigenous Foundation (FUNAI), the
state agency in charge of indigenous affairs, the Guaranis agreed to pull out of
11 of the farms on Monday.
But they will maintain a presence on the three largest ranches, in order to
press FUNAI to expand their reserve by incorporating the land on which the farms
are located.
Anthropologists say the indigenous community has a legitimate ancestral claim to
the property in question, under the Brazilian constitution.
But the ranchers have rejected the agreement, and want the Indians to withdraw
from all of the farms. ''The size of a property does not define rights,'' and an
invasion of land cannot be accepted just because a particular ranch is bigger
than the others, said the president of the Mato Grosso do Sul Federation of
Agriculture and Stockbreeding, Leoncio de Brito.
The Federation is planning a protest in the area next Saturday to demonstrate
support for the ''friends who have been suffering the invasion for the last 40
days.'' The goal is to bring together 5,000 people in a ''peaceful
demonstration,'' said de Brito.
But the press has reported rumours that the ranchers will hire gunmen to
forcibly evict the Indians from the farms. Sebastiao de Souza, the mayor of
Japorán, one of the two municipalities where the land occupations have taken
place, warned of the possibility of a massacre.
The ranchers accuse the Indians of stealing and butchering cattle, and of
destroying installations and infrastructure on the occupied farms.
The Guaranis, who belong to the Ñandeva sub-group, want to expand their legally
demarcated property by adding 7,800 hectares from the occupied ranches to the
1,600 hectares already comprising their Aldea Puerto Lindo reserve.
The Dec. 22 land invasions were planned as a means of pressuring FUNAI to expand
the reserve, as the Indians have long demanded.
Rubem Almeida, one of the two anthropologists who wrote the report that will
serve as the basis for the demarcation of the territory by FUNAI, said the
Guaranis are legally entitled to the land.
He pointed out that there is testimony and material evidence that the Guaranis
traditionally lived on the property in question, as well as ''specific documents
from 1927'' that confirm their legal claim to the land.
The ''usurpation'' of the property began in 1928, Almeida told IPS, when the
government illegally sold the area to a farmer who grew ''maté'' -- a South
American herb used to produce a beverage with properties similar to those of tea
-- on a large-scale.
Under the Brazilian constitution, the local indigenous community has a right to
that land, which cancels out the land titles reportedly held by the ranchers,
who should be paid compensation by the state, said the anthropologist.
Of the estimated 34,000 Guarani Indians in Brazil, between 8,000 and 10,000
belong to the Ñandeva sub-group, according to the Socioambiental Institute, a
non-governmental organisation dedicated to the research and support of
indigenous rights. The Guarani are also present in neighbouring Argentina and
Paraguay.
In Brazil, a country of 177 million, the Guaranis are concentrated in the state
of Mato Grosso do Sul.
There is a high suicide rate among the Guaranis, and especially the young, in
Brazil. Last year, 51 suicides were reported, similar to the annual average
registered over the past 10 years, Jorge Vieira, local coordinator of the
Indigenist Missionary Council, a Catholic Church group, said in a conversation
with IPS.
Vieira and Almeida concurred that although scarcity of land is not the only
factor underlying the high suicide rate, the expansion of the reserves is a
basic condition for resolving the problem.
In the case of Aldea Puerto Lindo, there is ''a clear imbalance'' between the
size of the local population and the 1,600 hectares comprising the reserve, said
Almeida.
While only 600 Guaranis lived on the reserve 30 years ago, that total has risen
fivefold since then.
The growth of the population of the reserve is one of the factors that prompted
the Indians to take a more radical approach to their struggle to recover the
land to which they have an ancestral claim, the anthropologist explained.
But on the other side of the dispute are the farmers and ranchers who claim to
have documents proving that they are the legal owners of the land. In many
cases, the people living on the farms today are the children or grandchildren of
those who were originally sold the land by the government between 50 and 80
years ago.
During that period, the Brazilian government sold farmers land that according to
the current constitution, enacted in 1988, belongs to indigenous communities if
anthropological studies demonstrate that it formed part of their traditional
homeland.
But enforcing that constitutional right involves a lengthy, complicated process
which requires the formal demarcation of indigenous reserves, indemnification of
farmers for the improvements, construction and work carried out on their
property, and the relocation of farmers to other areas.
There are many properties in dispute in Mato Grosso do Sul, a state that is home
to several indigenous communities whose reserves shrank as the agricultural
frontier expanded.
Pío Queiroz Silva, a rancher who lives in the Mato Grosso do Sul municipality of
Antonio Joao, is all too familiar with the problem. Part of his property has
been occupied by a group of Indians since 1998.
Red tape and FUNAI's shortcomings have delayed a final solution, he told IPS in
a telephone interview. ''If the land should belong to the Indians, okay, then
they should just pay me the indemnification and I'll go elsewhere.''
Silva, 48, has spent his entire life on the farm that his father acquired from
the government 54 years ago. The 4,500 hectares have now been divvied up between
himself, his father and his brother.
Silva estimates that over the past five years, he has lost more than 300 head of
cattle to the Indians living on his property.
He clarified, however, that ''I'm not against the Indians,'' and pointed out
that he has set up a non-governmental organisation to help them, called Recové,
which means ''living well'' in Guarani.
But he demands respect for his own rights as an individual and a farmer who also
has a legal claim to the land.
|