|
CLIMATE CHANGE:
Brazil Has No National Policy
Carlos
Tautz
RIO DE JANEIRO, (IPS) -
Brazil has no national strategy
to fight pollution that
contributes to global climate
change, in spite of being part
of the trio of developing
countries, with China and India,
that emit most greenhouse gases,
experts and environmentalists
complain.
Nor is it developing policies to
help it face its vulnerability
to climate change.
According to figures provided by
Brazil to the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate
Change, the country emitted
nearly 1.47 billion tons of
gases which contribute to
keeping the heat of the sun's
rays in the atmosphere, known as
the greenhouse effect, in 1994,
the last year for which figures
were available.
Also in 1994, India emitted 1.23
billion tons of gases and China
3.65 billion tons, making it the
top polluter among developing
countries, which are not yet
obliged to reduce their
emissions.
The United States, which
according to the Convention
ought to reduce its emissions,
produced 6.3 billion tons of
greenhouse gases in 2004.
Under the Kyoto Protocol, which
entered into force in 2005 as an
instrument of the Convention,
only rich countries that have
ratified it are obliged to cut
their gas emissions by 2012 to
volumes 5.2 percent lower than
their 1990 levels.
Brazil acknowledges it shares
responsibility for the
pollution. But it prefers to
point out that climate change is
a result of long term emissions
from rich countries, especially
the United States and the United
Kingdom, since the Industrial
Revolution in the late 18th
century.
"That argument could lead to
immobility," said biologist
Paulo Moutinho of the
non-governmental Amazon
Institute for Environmental
Research (IPAM). "Hardly
anything in Brazil qualifies as
a national policy on climate
change," he added.
IPAM specialises in the Amazon
region where Brazil's largest
forest fires occur,
"representing 75 percent of the
country's total emissions of
greenhouse gases," said Moutinho
in an interview with IPS.
"Brazil isn't prepared for
climate change," said scientist
José Antonio Marengo of the
National Institute for Space
Research (INPE), whose team has
carried out a study assessing
national climate trends and
sketching possible scenarios for
2100, which will be presented to
the Environment Ministry on Feb.
26.
"We adapted global models to
conditions in Brazil," Marengo
explained to IPS. "Our study was
carried out with models designed
by the University of Sao Paulo
and by INPE, where they were run
on a supercomputer, so it's
equivalent to a mini-IPCC report
(Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, the main
international assessment body)."
The IPCC reported on Feb. 2 that
there is a 90 percent
probability that climate change
is due to human activities, and
that temperatures on earth may
increase by up to four degrees
by the end of this century,
leading to changes in rainfall
patterns, the extent of
habitable coastal land in a
number of countries, and food
production.
Marengo had already presented a
similar study based on general
models to the government in
2005.
"The poor will suffer the most,"
he said, and the hardest-hit
region will be an area in the
semi-arid northeast, "from the
west of Piauí state to the south
of Ceará, the north of Bahía and
the west of Pernambuco," where
some of the cities with the
lowest levels of human
development are found.
The projections indicate a risk
of droughts lasting 10 years or
more. "The government is very
unprepared to respond to
emergencies in that area. The
most it can probably do is
distribute food baskets,"
Marengo said.
Meanwhile, in the Amazon
rainforest to the north, the
greatest impact will be the loss
of biodiversity.
Moutinho and Marengo both said
the issue has not received
enough attention from the
authorities, who have not taken
the environment into account as
a variable in the investment
programme for 2007-2010,
announced on Jan. 22 by
President Luiz Inácio Lula da
Silva. The Growth Acceleration
Programme (PAC) provides for
investments of nearly 250
billion dollars in hydroelectric
stations, roads, nuclear energy
plants, oil production,
enlarging ports and airports,
shipbuilding and the planting of
millions of hectares of
oil-bearing crops to produce
biofuels.
An environmental component in
this package could have been
suggested by the Brazilian Forum
on Climate Change, which Lula
created by decree in 2000, to
increase awareness and mobilise
society about the debate and
position to be taken on problems
related to climate change caused
by greenhouse gases.
The forum, presided over by Lula
and made up of 12 ministers, as
well as representatives from
scientific and non-governmental
organisations, was supposed to
assist the government to
incorporate climate change
issues into the different stages
of public policies. So far, it
has only held a few meetings at
universities.
"Environmentalists are always
criticising the country's
vulnerability. But Hurricane
Katrina (in 2005) proved that
not even the United States is
ready to face this kind of
problem," said José Domingos
Gonzalez Miguez, coordinator of
a government commission on
global climate change at the
Science and Technology Ministry
since 1994.
Gonzalez Miguez is the
best-qualified official in the
field, and helped draw up
Brazilian proposals that were
incorporated into the Kyoto
Protocol. He emphasised Brazil's
contribution towards a solution
for climate problems.
"We proposed two key premises
which oriented the entire
debate, like the historic
contribution of greenhouse gases
from developed countries," said
Miguez. The Brazilian proposal
was praised by
environmentalists.
"We are doing more than the
Protocol requires from us. We
are not obliged to reduce our
emissions, yet we already have
over 106 projects for the Clean
Development Mechanism (CDM),
equivalent to 10 percent of the
global total," he said.
The CDM is an arrangement under
the Kyoto Protocol which allows
rich countries to fulfil part of
their obligations by investing
in clean development projects in
countries of the developing
South.
Furthermore, Gonzalez Miguez
argues, the role of developing
countries in climate change is
"exaggerated. If a hurricane
occurred now, our contribution
would have been minimal. Brazil
produces only two percent of
total emissions, and it started
to emit them when it
industrialised, 50 years ago,
two centuries after the rich
countries started to pollute the
atmosphere," he said.
It is not easy for a country
with the social problems that
Brazil has to devote itself to
overcoming climate
vulnerability. "The government
must choose between investing in
health, education and
sanitation, or preparing itself
for climate change. However,
about 50 million dollars a year
are being spent on preventing
forest fires, the main source of
greenhouse gases in Brazil,"
Gonzalez Miguez said.
But these figures do not
accurately describe the
availability of public funds. In
2007, this country will pay out
nearly 50 billion dollars to
domestic and foreign creditors.
Nevertheless, in 2006 the area
of forest cut down or subjected
to "queimadas" (the slash and
burn technique) was less than
half that in 2004.
Gonzalez Miguez acknowledged
that the reduction of
deforestation was partly due to
the fall in the international
prices of agricultural products,
especially soya, the cultivation
of which had fuelled
deforestation.
Lula's government has also
prevented deforestation, IPAM
recognised, by establishing some
240,000 square kilometres of new
protected areas in the Amazon
region in 2004 and 2005,
especially where forest clearing
was most intensive.
"These new protected areas will
have an important effect on
future emissions of carbon to
the atmosphere," said the report
"The Amazon in a Changing
Climate" by IPAM, the U.S. Woods
Hole Research Centre and the
Federal University of Minas
Gerais.
However, it is common for
deforested zones used for crops
or cattle-raising to extend
right up to the borders of the
protected areas, and the
government lacks staff and
equipment to prevent potential
trespassing.
|
|