|
DEVELOPMENT-ARGENTINA:
The Forgotten
North
Marcela
Valente
BUENOS AIRES, (IPS) -
Poverty and unemployment rates
are on the wane in Argentina,
and infant mortality is also in
retreat. But these ills are
holding out in the neglected
north, which has been bypassed
by development.
"After the 2001 crisis, recovery
didn't take place evenly across
the country. The north of
Argentina is still burdened with
longstanding difficulties, and a
major political effort is needed
for a long time to come,"
Liliana de Riz, director of the
team that drew up the Human
Development Report for 2005,
told IPS.
The study, sponsored by the
United Nations Development
Programme (UNDP), is entitled
"Argentina after the Crisis: A
Time of Opportunity". One of its
two chapters refers to the nine
most disadvantaged provinces,
which are located in the north.
Seven and a half million people
in Argentina - 20.8 percent of
the population - live in Jujuy,
Salta, Catamarca, Tucumán,
Santiago del Estero, Chaco,
Misiones, Formosa and Corrientes,
the area described by the report
as Argentina's "critical
region". In 2004, more than 60
percent of the population of
these nine provinces was living
below the poverty line, compared
with 44 percent in the country
as a whole.
Living conditions have improved
since the peak of Argentina's
severe social and economic
crisis, in 2002, when the
poverty rate in several
provinces - such as Formosa,
which borders on Paraguay -
climbed as high as 80 percent.
"But much more is needed," said
de Riz.
"Federalism in Argentina isn't
cooperative," in the sense that
there are no federal policies to
foment development in depressed
regions, she pointed out.
Thus, the national infant
mortality rate is 16 per
thousand live births, while in
the nine northern provinces it
stands at 22 per thousand,
soaring to over 27 per thousand
in places like Chaco - twice the
rate for the southern Patagonia
region.
The report emphasises that 26.5
percent of Argentine children
under five live in the north,
"with the lowest human
development indices and the
greatest relative
disadvantages." This is a heavy
mortgage on their future.
Illiteracy in the "critical
region", which has the lowest
urban population, is twice the
national rate, and access to
health, education and decent
housing is markedly lower than
in the rest of the country.
Why has this subregion failed to
benefit from the economic
recovery that began in 2003 and
has been reflected in nine
percent annual gross domestic
product (GDP) growth? There are
several different reasons, many
of them structural. For
instance, the crisis accentuated
the area's pre-existing
isolation.
"At present, the productivity of
this region is insufficient for
its development," the report
states. The north contributes
only 10 percent of the country's
GDP, and if productivity per
person is measured, the north
produces only half the national
average..
Investment in the subregion is
just 10 percent of what is
invested countrywide, and the
area accounts for only eight
percent of the country's foreign
trade. One third of exports from
the north, which are
concentrated in the hands of
only a few businesses, are
minerals from the province of
Catamarca.
"There are very few employment
opportunities outside the public
sector," the report states. In
the north there are 1.2
employees in the private sector
for every one in the public
sector, whereas the nationwide
ratio is three to one.
In Argentina, a large proportion
of unemployed heads of
households have survived thanks
to subsidies from the national
government. When the economy
began to revive, many of these
people returned to the labour
market. But once again this
process did not apply in the
"critical region". In the rest
of Argentina, most of the
recipients of these subsidies
are now women, whereas in the
north the majority are young
men.
Since productive enterprises and
structures in the north are on a
small-scale, progress in
development will depend on their
expansion by linking together
businesses that are currently
isolated, to integrate providers
of technology, logistical
services and transport, the UNDP
report recommends.
With respect to the national
government, the study indicates
that every ministry shares the
responsibility for regional
development. However, the
instruments applied are
"dispersed," disjointed, and
there is "great discontinuity"
due to changes of government and
of policy.
"What is needed are concerted
public policies that are
sustained over a long period of
time," advises the report, which
points out possible ways to
develop alternative products in
the agrifood, tourism, mining
and forestry sectors. This will
require investment, and
education and training of
personnel, it underlines.
De Riz believes that the best
way for the north to overcome
its stagnation is to imitate the
model of "industry clustering"
implemented in the United
States, India, Mexico, Spain,
the United Kingdom, Tanzania and
Brazil. This involves a
concentration of services and
providers, which bring the
benefits of synergy to
businesses and their employees.
"'Industry clustering means that
groups of communities and
industries work collaboratively,
bringing together their
complementary knowledge,
experience and motivation, in
order to bolster their
competitive advantages,'" the
report quotes.
Areas with potential for
development along these lines
exist, especially in agriculture
and livestock production, but so
far they are in isolation.
Catamarca, for example, could
diversify into producing
walnuts, red peppers and organic
produce, while Corrientes could
farm "pacú" fish and ornamental
fish species.
Jujuy, on the border with
Bolivia, is advised to develop
rural and historical tourism,
and to cultivate mangoes,
avocadoes, figs and honey on a
larger scale. Another suggestion
is to give a boost to llama
herding and cheese making, as an
alternative to the cows' milk
products from central Argentina.
Most of these production options
have been tried out locally, and
many have already grown to the
point where they could be
expanded into networks, with
technological improvements,
innovation and higher quality,
the report emphasises.
According to de Riz, "more
effort on a continuous basis is
needed from the national
government, the provinces, and
the private sector, if we are to
lay the foundations of a country
that is truly integrated."
|
|