
 |
MONEY LAUNDERING:
Costa Rica
SOURCE:
International Narcotics Control Strategy Report -2003
Released by the Bureau for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs
March 2004
Costa Rica remains vulnerable to money laundering and other financial crimes,
due to the narcotics trafficking in the region. Costa Rica is a haven for
Internet gaming companies. Despite 2002 reforms of the Costa Rican
counternarcotics law to expand the scope of anti-money laundering regulations,
the government’s licensing and supervision of the offshore sector and nonbank
financial institutions remain inadequate.
Gambling is legal in Costa Rica, although the currency that is subject to
Internet gaming operations may not be transferred to Costa Rica. Consequently,
over 100 sports book companies operate in Costa Rica by paying administrative
costs locally and accepting bets to accounts located outside of Costa Rica.
Low taxes and strong secrecy laws have created an offshore sector in Costa Rica
that offers banking, corporate, and trust formation services. These
foreign-domiciled “offshore” banks can only conduct transactions under a service
contract with a domestic bank, and they do not engage directly in financial
operations in Costa Rica. Instead, these banks receive or transfer funds in
foreign currency, generally using correspondent accounts in other countries,
thus avoiding most of the financial rules and laws of Costa Rica.
Currently, eight offshore banks maintain correspondent operations in Costa Rica,
including three from the Bahamas, three from Panama, one from the Cayman Islands
and one from Montserrat. In all cases save the Cayman Islands, the Government of
Costa Rica (GOCR) has signed supervision agreements with its counterparts,
permitting the review of correspondent banking operations. Costa Rican
authorities admit that these agreements are restricted and prevent, for example,
the review of current liabilities in the Bahamas.
The licensing procedure for foreign-domiciled banks remains inadequate. The
Central Bank approves applications for foreign-domiciled banks to operate in
Costa Rica by relying on a foreign jurisdiction’s certificate of good standing.
 |
Foreign-domiciled banks are required only to
provide monthly balance statements and year-end
audits to the General Superintendent of the
Financial System (SUGEF). In 2003, SUGEF
reviewed the operations of all seven offshore
banks in countries where a supervision agreement
exists. However, SUGEF only has authority over
the domestic activity of these foreign-domiciled
banks. All other activity of the offshore banks
is beyond SUGEF supervision.
|
Evidence of black market Colombian peso exchange through private banks in Costa
Rica declined dramatically in 2003. These exchange schemes permitted the
transfer of $225 million between April 2002 and December 2002 by Colombian
international credit card holders and currency exchange houses who carried large
sums of declared currency (often between $100,000 and $300,000) to Costa Rican
banks.
The U.S. dollars were transferred to U.S. banks and then to Colombian banks,
where account holders profit from arbitrage exchange rates. The flow of money to
Costa Rica dropped to approximately $40 million in 2003. Since August, the flow
of money via couriers has slowed to a trickle. It is not yet known if the
capital flow has shifted to other countries or if different transaction schemes
are being used in Costa Rica.
In January 2002, Costa Rica expanded the scope of Law 7786 via Law 8204 to
criminalize the laundering of proceeds from all serious crimes. The newly
expanded law nominally obligates domestic financial institutions (not offshore
banks) and other businesses (such as money exchangers) to identify their
clients, report currency transactions over $10,000, report suspicious
transactions, keep financial records for at least five years, and identify the
beneficial owners of accounts and transacted funds.

While law 8204, in theory, covers the movement of all capital, current
regulations based on 8204, Chapter IV, Article 14, apply a restrictive
interpretation that covers only those entities involved in the transfer of funds
as a primary business purpose. The 2002 law does not cover casinos, jewelry
dealers or Internet gambling operations whose primary business is not the
transfer of funds.
The reforms to Law 7786 do not grant SUGEF the authority to conduct on-site
money laundering inspections or to incorporate money laundering compliance
testing into the inspections it does conduct, such as the prudential safety and
soundness inspections that are carried out under Law 7558. Costa Rica has yet to
prosecute anyone successfully under its anti-money laundering law.
Costa Rica’s financial intelligence unit (FIU), the Centro de Inteligencia
Conjunto Antidrogas/Unidad de Analisis Financiero (CICAD/UAF), became
operational in 1998 and was admitted into the Egmont Group of FIUs in May 1999.
Despite commitment and expertise, the FIU is ill equipped to handle its current
caseload (currently more than 230 cases) and to provide the information needed
by investigators. Nevertheless, the unit’s analysis of the rotation of currency
with no evident means of income led to the arrest in June 2003 of eight suspects
in a narcotics distribution case.
Another case involved the transfer of capital between Costa Rica, Nicaragua and
Guatemala that led to the arrest of six suspected narcotics traffickers in
December 2003. The unit has also collaborated with the FBI on a suspected
sweepstakes fraud in which the “winners” pay an administrative fee of up to
$1,000 to various Costa Rican accounts through wire transfers. A new SUGEF
regulation permitting regulatory entities to send incomplete Suspicious Activity
Reports back to the drafting bank may reduce the number of inadequate reports
and give the FIU better information to analyze.
Costa Rican authorities continue to lack the ability to block, seize, or freeze
property without prior judicial approval. Thus, Costa Rica lacks the ability to
expeditiously freeze assets connected to terrorists and terrorism.
Regarding terrorism and terrorist financing, Costa Rica has ratified all major
antiterrorism conventions. A government interagency Task Force recently
completed drafting a comprehensive antiterrorism law with specific terrorist
financing provisions. The draft law would expand existing conspiracy laws to
include the financing of terrorism.
It would also enhance existing narcotics laws by incorporating the prevention of
terrorism finance into the mandate of the Costa Rican Drug Institute. The
antiterrorism legislation will be introduced during the December 2003 to May
2004 extraordinary session of the Legislative Assembly.
Costa Rica is a party to the 1988 UN Drug Convention, the UN International
Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism, and the UN
Convention against Transnational Organized Crime. Costa Rica has also signed the
OAS Inter-American Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters. Costa
Rica is a member of the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force (CFATF) and the
aforementioned Egmont Group.
Costa Rica needs to improve its supervision of the offshore banking sector
located in the country and should extend its anti-money laundering regime to
cover the Internet gaming sector and other nonbank financial institutions such
as jewelry or gem dealers and casinos. Costa Rica should also criminalize the
financing and support of terrorists and terrorism. Greater attention should also
be given to the needs of the FIU, which is currently unable to adequately
support the needs of law enforcement. These are major deficiencies in Costa
Rica’s anti-money laundering regime that need to be addressed if the country is
to build on the progress it has made in this area.
|