|
|
 |
 |
HOME
Where it all begins!
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
INSIDECOSTARICA.COM
| COSTA
RICA NEWS BRIEFS
|
Wednesday 19 January 2011 |
 |
|
 |
WikiLeaks:
Costa
Rica Not
So
Neutral?
By
Nikolas
Kozloff,
Huffington
Post
As more
and more
WikiLeaks
cables
are
released,
a true
cloak
and
dagger
picture
of U.S.
foreign
policy
is
emerging.
Take,
for
example,
recent
documents
pertaining
to
Central
America,
where
the Bush
administration
sought
to
bolster
its
regional
allies
in an
effort
to
counteract
the
political
influence
of
Venezuela.
Alarmed
by
rising
star
Hugo
Chávez,
who was
fast
making
ideological
inroads
within
Washington's
traditional
sphere
of
influence,
diplomats
promised
to
collaborate
on
sensitive
intelligence
gathering
in an
effort
to halt
the
region's
dangerous
shift to
the
left.
One
cable
dates to
November,
2004
when the
region's
so-called
"Pink
Tide"
was just
getting
underway.
For five
years,
Chávez
had been
in power
but in
Central
America
the Bush
administration
could
count on
the
support
of a
host of
friendly
client
governments.
Indeed,
it would
not be
until
several
years
later
that
leftists
Daniel
Ortega,
Mauricio
Funes
and
Manuel
Zelaya
would
win the
presidencies
of
Nicaragua,
El
Salvador
and
Honduras,
respectively.
Nevertheless,
judging
from the
cables
regional
governments
were
already
extremely
wary of
Chávez.
Costa
Rica has
long
prided
itself
on its
political
independence
and
long-term
stability.
The
country
has no
standing
army,
and
during
the
height
of U.S.
counter-insurgency
involvement
in the
region
some
twenty
five
years
ago the
San José
government
played a
key role
in
drawing
up a
Central
American
peace
plan.
More
often
than
not,
however,
Costa
Rica has
proven
to be a
willing
partner
in
Washington's
wider
geopolitical
designs.
Indeed,
the 2004
cable
reveals
intelligence
collaboration
at the
highest
levels.
Chávez
and
Washington
Spar in
Central
America
The
cable,
which is
marked
"secret"
relates
to a
meeting
between
former
Costa
Rican
president
Abel
Pacheco
and U.S.
ambassador
to
Brazil
John
Danilovich.
During a
Pacheco
visit to
Brasilia,
the
Costa
Rican
made a
point of
dining
with the
American
diplomat.
Elected
in 2002,
conservative
Pacheco
had
ingratiated
himself
in
Washington
by
pushing
free-market
reforms.
Confiding
in
Danilovich,
the
Costa
Rican
remarked
that he
was
concerned
about
Hugo
Chávez's
intelligence
gathering
activities
in
Central
America.
According
to
Danilovich,
the
Costa
Rican
government
was "surveilling
the
activities
of the
Venezuelan
cultural
attaché
in San
José."
The
attaché
was
believed
to be an
intelligence
officer
who was
"meeting
secretly
with
labor
union
officials,
and has
brought
200,000
USD into
Costa
Rica to
pay
labor
activists
to stage
'provocations,'
perhaps
during
the
upcoming
Ibero-American
summit
in Costa
Rica."
The
summit,
which
would
bring
many
important
hemispheric
leaders
to Costa
Rica,
would
shortly
take
place in
San
José.
Alarmed
by
alleged
Venezuelan
spying,
Pacheco
asked
Danilovich
if the
U.S.
could
provide
needed
intelligence
on the
matter.
Though
the
cable
does not
elaborate
on wider
U.S.-Costa
Rican
political
ties and
likely
joint
intelligence
operations,
the
document
states
that
Danilovich
promised
to refer
Pacheco's
request
to
higher
authorities.
In the
event,
Pacecho
needn't
have
worried
about
being
upstaged
at the
Ibero-American
summit.
Just
days
before
the San
José
meeting,
a
terrorist
attack
resulted
in the
untimely
death of
Venezuelan
prosecutor
Danilo
Anderson,
an
official
who had
been
actively
investigating
opposition
figures
involved
in an
April,
2002
coup
attempt
which
briefly
unseated
Chávez
from
power.
In a
communiqué,
the
Venezuelan
government
announced
that the
Anderson
case
"was not
isolated"
as
Caracas
had
already
withstood
numerous
efforts
aimed at
destabilizing
the
government.
As a
result
of the
Anderson
attack
and
rising
instability,
Chávez
cancelled
his
visit to
Costa
Rica.
What's
Behind
the
Cable?
The
Danilovich
cable,
though
brief,
raises a
number
of
questions
about
Costa
Rica and
the
country's
place
within
the
wider
geopolitical
milieu.
Though
it may
seem
surprising
that San
José
would be
involved
in such
high-level
cloak
and
dagger
diplomacy,
trouble
had been
brewing
between
Costa
Rica and
Venezuela
for some
time.
Far from
acting
as a
casual
observer,
Costa
Rica
took a
keen
interest
in
political
developments
in
Venezuela
and may
have
sided
with
anti-Chávez
forces.
In
2002-3,
Chávez
was put
on the
defensive,
first by
a
military
coup
d'etat
which
nearly
toppled
the
government
and
later by
a 63-day
lock out
which
nearly
crippled
the
nation's
oil
industry
and
caused
severe
economic
damage.
A key
figure
during
the
lockout
was
Carlos
Ortega,
president
of the
the
country's
largest
labor
union,
the
Venezuelan
Workers'
Confederation
or CTV.
When
authorities
called
for
Ortega's
arrest,
charging
him with
rebellion,
conspiracy,
treason
and
inciting
delinquency,
the
union
man
sought
refuge
in the
Costa
Rican
embassy
in
Caracas.
Though
officials
allowed
for
Ortega's
safe
passage
out of
Venezuela,
several
months
later
Chávez
ratcheted
up the
rhetoric
by
accusing
Ortega
and
Costa
Rica of
conspiring
against
his
government.
As proof
of his
allegations,
Chávez
offered
up tapes
of a
supposed
telephone
conversation
between
Ortega
and
Venezuelan
opposition
figures
in which
plans
for a
"civil
rebellion"
were
discussed.
On his
radio
show,
Aló,
Presidente!,
Chávez
claimed
that
Costa
Rica was
"supporting
the
presence
in San
José of
these
coup
plotters,
giving
them
support,
security
and
resources."
Responding
to the
incendiary
charges,
Pacheco
denied
that any
members
of his
government
had
conspired
against
Venezuela.
"I can
assure
Chávez
that the
policy
of the
Costa
Rican
government
is
non-intervention
in the
internal
affairs
of any
country,"
Pacheco
remarked.
Throughout
its
history,
the
Costa
Rican
added,
Costa
Rica had
welcomed
foreign
exiles
but only
under
the
strict
condition
that
they
would
abstain
from
subversive
political
activities
relating
to their
countries
of
origin.
Chávez,
however,
was
unconvinced
by
Pacheco's
public
diplomacy
and
hinted
that
Venezuela
might
stop
selling
oil to
Costa
Rica at
preferential
rates if
the San
José
government
failed
to clamp
down on
political
conspiracies
designed
to
unseat
him from
power.
Costa
Rica:
Not So
Neutral?
In
light of
Chávez's
volatile
accusations,
it is
not
surprising
that
Costa
Rica
felt
paranoid
about
Venezuelan
intelligence
operations
and
sought
out
Washington's
counsel.
WikiLeaks
cables
hint at
this
ongoing
spying
which
took
place
against
a
backdrop
of
barely
concealed
tensions.
By 2005,
now two
years
after
the
Ortega
affair,
Chávez
was in a
much
better
political
position.
Having
beaten
back his
opposition,
the
Venezuelan
president
was now
something
of a
leftist
cause
célčbre
and had
extended
his
geopolitical
influence
throughout
the
region.
As a
more
conservative-leaning
country,
Costa
Rica was
now
embroiled
in wider
political
tensions
sweeping
through
Latin
America.
Seeking
to
portray
himself
as
something
of a
neutral
peacemaker,
Pacheco
tried to
mediate
between
Mexico
and
Venezuela
during a
diplomatic
spat.
Blasting
Mexico,
Chávez
had
earlier
called
President
Vicente
Fox "a
puppy
dog" of
the
United
States.
The
Mexican
leader,
Chávez
added,
was
given to
"kneeling
down"
before
Washington.
Looking
macho
before
the
television
cameras,
Chávez
intoned
"don't
mess
with me,
mister."
As both
countries
withdrew
their
respective
ambassadors,
Pacheco
called
for both
Fox and
Chávez
to be
civil.
Taking
the
moral
high
ground,
Pacheco
declared
that it
was
hardly a
propitious
moment
for the
two
leaders
to
divide
Latin
America,
adding
that
Chávez
and Fox
should
give
each
other a
"fraternal
hug." A
couple
of
months
later,
Pacheco
was at
it
again,
calling
for
Chávez
and Bush
to sit
down and
to try
to
"understand
each
other."
The
Costa
Rican
was
prompted
to
intervene
after
Chávez
said the
world
opposed
Bush and
Washington's
"imperialist
and
genocidal
war in
Iraq." A
voice of
reason
in the
middle
of
ideological
extremes,
Pacheco
asked
plaintively
"who
benefits
from
this
fight?"
In more
recent
years
Costa
Rica
has, if
anything,
become
even
more
allied
to
Washington.
In May,
2006
Óscar
Arias
succeeded
Pacheco
as
president.
A
veritable
grandfather
of Costa
Rican
politics,
Arias
proved
to be no
great
admirer
of Fidel
Castro
or Hugo
Chávez.
In the
summer
of 2009,
when
Honduran
President
and
Chávez
ally
Manuel
Zelaya
was
removed
in a
military
coup
d'etat
and a
new de
facto
regime
installed,
tensions
ran high
between
Venezuela
and
Costa
Rica.
When
Arias
attempted
to
mediate
the
Honduran
imbroglio,
Chávez
charged
that the
Costa
Rican
president
was
attempting
to set a
crafty
trap.
The de
facto
coup
government
in
Tegucigalpa,
Chávez
declared,
should
never
have
been
granted
recognition
or
invited
to the
negotiation
table in
the
first
place.
As more
leftist
governments
have
taken
power in
Central
America,
Costa
Rica has
made
some
controversial
political
choices.
Laura
Chinchilla,
an Arias
protégé
who took
over the
reins of
power in
2010,
has
invited
the U.S.
Navy to
deploy
to Costa
Rican
waters,
an
unprecedented
buildup
which
goes
against
the
small
Central
American
nation's
anti-militarist
history.
With
Costa
Rica
pursuing
closer
ties to
Washington,
the
country's
reputation
as a
neutral
mediator
has come
into
doubt.
Just how
much
intelligence
collaboration
existed
between
San José
and
successive
U.S.
administrations?
Did
Costa
Rica
undertake
specific
moves to
halt
Chávez's
geopolitical
advance
in
Central
America?
Hopefully,
further
WikiLeaks
disclosures
will
give us
insight
into
these
matters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
| |
Costa Rica's Daily English News
Source
Apdo. 2133-1000, San José, Costa
Rica
Tel: (506) 2231 3205 / (506) 8399
9642
Fax: (506) 2232 6337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insidecostarica is an independent news media
portal featuring news of Costa Rica, Central
America, Latin America and other wonderful
and weir stuff. External links are
provided for reference purposes.
Insidecostarica.com is not responsible for
the content of the external sites.
If you need more information or to provide
recommendations, write to
[email protected]
|
|
|
|
|