|
Eco-Tourism Leaves Print in
Costa Rica
By
Alex Hutchinson, CanWest News
Service
On my first day in Costa Rica, a
woman in San José explained to
me why bus rides in outlying
areas can sometimes take four
hours to cover 40 kilometres.
"The geography is so hilly here
that the only way to build roads
is to dynamite the hills, but
now we are all doing
eco-tourism," she explained
shrugging expressively. "So
we're not allowed to dynamite
the hills anymore."
It's a national sacrifice that
has paid off: Costa Rica is the
original eco-tourism success
story, the home of innovations
like zip-line tours through the
rainforest canopy, and a world
leader with 25 per cent of its
land protected from development.
About 1.7 million tourists
visited the tiny country
(population four million) in
2006, generating an estimated
$1.6 billion US in revenue, more
than twice what exports of
coffee and bananas bring to the
country.
These days, everything from
eating lunch to screaming
through the woods on an
all-terrain vehicle is branded
as an eco-experience. But the
balance between success and
sustainability is a delicate
one, and some of the country's
most popular attractions now
risk being overrun by tourists
tripping over each other in
their search for solitude and
unspoiled natural beauty.
"Costa Rica is known as being
the father of eco-tourism, as
far as countries go," says Brian
Mullis, the president of
Sustainable Travel
International, a Colorado-based
advocacy group. "But since that
time, they've lost market share
to neighbouring countries like
Nicaragua, where there are far
fewer tourists, and where it
could be argued that the
environment at some of the major
sites is much more pristine."
My girlfriend and I went to
Costa Rica for two weeks in
early December, at the tail-end
of the rainy season. Even though
that's a bit before the tourist
high season, which spans the dry
months from mid-December to
April, we found that some of the
"must-see" destinations were
disappointingly crowded.
But we also found plenty of
places protected by remoteness,
bad roads, or arduous hikes,
where the wildlife and the
landscape were every bit as
stunning as at the big
destinations. You don't have to
veer too far off the beaten
tourist track to recapture the
original spirit of eco-tourism
-- and with a bit of extra
planning you can help ensure
that your presence doesn't make
things worse.
The signs posted at the entrance
and along the trails of Manuel
Antonio National Park are clear
and multilingual: "Do not feed
the monkeys!" The problem is bad
enough that the authorities have
even begun publishing the names
and photos of people caught
breaking the rule in the local
paper.
So perhaps we shouldn't have
been surprised when, as we hiked
along the park's main trail, an
enterprising capuchin monkey
jumped on my girlfriend's back
and started tugging at the
zipper of her backpack. Or when,
a few minutes later, a coati (a
raccoon-like animal) dashed out
of the undergrowth and snatched
a packet of cookies literally
from my hands.
That was a low point: aside from
the negative ecological impact,
I was pretty hungry at the time.
Manuel Antonio is the most
visited park in Costa Rica.
Along with monkeys, there are
sloths, iguanas, toucans and
more than 350 other species of
birds in the rainforest and
along the rocky coastline. But
the word we heard most often to
describe it from travellers and
locals in other parts of the
country was Disneyland. The
narrow trails are so congested
that regular traffic jams occur
whenever someone stops to
contemplate the sadly tame
animals.
To its credit, the Costa Rican
government is trying to save the
park from the perils of its own
success. It has capped the
number of daily visitors at 600
(800 on weekends and holidays),
and the park is closed on
Mondays to give the animals a
breather.
In contrast, just 40 kilometres
south along the coast from
Manuel Antonio, we went to a
wildlife refuge called Hacienda
Baru where the monkeys actually
seemed surprised to see us. The
difference: a bone-jarring
unpaved road that took more than
three hours by bus.
We spent about five hours at
Hacienda Baru, which is just
outside the laid-back surfer
town of Dominical, hiking the
trails and taking a guided
zip-line tour through the
rainforest canopy. We saw far
more animals than people -- just
one group. And our guide showed
us how to poke a stick into a
termite nest to get a snack
(termites have a nutty, almost
peanut-butter taste if you
crunch them with your teeth, we
discovered), and how to use live
leaf-cutter ants to suture a
cut. It was everything we had
hoped Manuel Antonio would be.
We had stumbled on an important
fact of Costa Rican travel: the
farther south you go, the more
unspoiled the surroundings are.
In the northern part of the
country, heavily developed beach
resorts dot both the Pacific and
Caribbean coasts. While most
airline flights still head to
San Jose, in the middle of the
country, the airport in Liberia
started accepting international
flights in 2003, providing even
more direct access to the
northern resorts.
Instead of going south, you can
also go up. We climbed Mount
Chirripo, the highest point in
the country at more than 3,800
metres, spending the night in a
refuge built into the rock two
hours below the summit. At the
top, on a clear day, you can see
both the Pacific Ocean to the
west and the Caribbean Sea to
the east. Located about three
hours southeast of San Jose,
it's not too remote -- but the
hike to the refuge, advertised
in guidebooks as about eight
hours one-way (it took us
considerably less), keeps the
crowds down.
It's not that having other
people around is, in itself,
bad. In fact, we shared the
mountain refuge with about 40
other hikers, mostly Costa
Ricans and Germans. Perhaps
because it was a self-selected
group willing to tackle the long
trail, but we found them to be a
very friendly bunch,
appreciative of their
surroundings and respectful of
the trails, which were free of
garbage and tame wildlife.
The presence of tourists,
paradoxically, is often crucial
to preserving rainforest and
other wilderness. Both Manuel
Antonio, in 1972, and Corcovado,
in 1975, were declared parks at
the last possible moment, with
bulldozers and loggers waiting
at the threshold. With a little
foresight, says Mullis of
Sustainable Travel
International, it's possible to
use your tourist status as a
force for good to preserve more
wilderness is preserved and to
spread the economic benefits
among the local community.
Mullis suggests calling ahead to
potential lodgings to ask about
their sustainability policies.
For instance, the Inn at Coyote
Mountain uses wind energy, grows
its own organic fruits and
vegetables and hires all its
staff locally.
The prices at upscale eco-lodges
might make a sparkling
conscience seem like a luxury.
But many of the same steps are
being taken by less expensive
lodges, Mullis says.
And another option is to try
community-based tourism: "You
can stay with local people for a
fraction of the cost of a
four-star lodge, and you know
that you're contributing to the
local economy and keeping money
in the country."
After two weeks there, my own
advice can be distilled to two
basic points.
First: go, if you get the
chance. It's beautiful. Second:
put in the extra effort to visit
places off the usual tourist
routes. It may be the only way
to keep the Cheeto-starved
monkey off your back.
|
|