Chavez at eye
of storm
Every Sunday, the
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez
holds court on his live TV show,
Alo Presidente (Hello
President).
For an average of five hours at
a time, Mr Chavez rants, jokes,
advises and entertains - by
turns politician, showman,
baseball fan, balladeer, and
propagandist.

"Look out! On 15 August I am
going to hit a home run so hard
that it will land in the gardens
of the White House! "
Hugo Chavez, speaking during
Alo Presidente, 1 August
|
OPPOSITION TASK
To succeed in Sunday's
referendum, the opposition
needs:
-
A turnout of at least 25% of
Venezuela's 14m eligible voters
-
More than the 3.7m votes Chavez
received in the 2000 elections
-
More votes than Chavez's
supporters
|
His supporters - many from the
slums outside the capital
Caracas - turn on in their
millions.
But for his detractors, it is Mr
Chavez at his most vulgar and
offensive - and if they get
their way, this Sunday will be
his last transmission.
In the latest battle of the war
over Venezuela, Mr Chavez will
face a national referendum on
whether he should remain in
power.
At the eye of the storm is Mr
Chavez and - with his black and
Indian ancestry, and provincial
accent - the kind of Venezuela
he represents, say analysts.
Edgardo Lander, sociology
lecturer at Venezuelan Central
University, says before Mr
Chavez arrived on the scene,
Venezuelan politics were "like
an upper-class party in which
everything was very refined and
educated and cosmopolitan.
"All of a sudden these people
from the outside come into the
party - people who smell, who
are Indian and black, who have
no manners."
For years, power in Venezuela
was concentrated in the hands of
a mostly white, middle- and
upper-class elite, who
controlled the country's huge
oil wealth - Venezuela is the
largest oil producer outside the
Middle East.
In 1989, austerity measures
imposed after an economic
downturn, coupled with a
two-party democratic system
considered corrupt and cronyist,
triggered street protests in
Caracas brutally put down by
military force.
At least 1,000 people are
estimated to have died in what
became known as the Caracazo.
Three years later, a group of
dissident army officers
attempted a military coup -
among them a 38-year-old
colonel, Hugo Chavez.
The coup failed, but authorities
decided to allow Mr Chavez a
minute on TV to persuade his
collaborators to surrender - and
in doing so, made a spectacular
blunder.
Mr Chavez admitted
responsibility for the coup
attempt and lamented the lives
lost - but defended the attempt
to overthrow an unpopular,
languishing system.
Looking into Venezuelan homes
across the land, Mr Chavez
promised to give up his arms "por
ahora" - "for now" - leaving
lingering the implicit threat
that he would be back. In 60
seconds, he had become a
household name.
Six years later, Mr Chavez did
come back - this time through
the front door, enjoying a
backing of 56% in 1998
presidential elections.
The results shocked Venezuela's
political classes - some even
suggesting devastating floods
shortly after Mr Chavez assumed
power reflected the divine upset
over his victory.
Mr Chavez's rewriting of the
constitution, re-structuring of
parliament, tendency to appoint
loyalists in high office,
authoritarianism and "communist"
rhetoric further enraged his
opponents - who also accuse him
of using thuggery to maintain
his hold on power.
Since his election, they have
waged a tireless campaign - work
stoppages, huge demonstrations,
and, in April 2002, a
short-lived coup - to see Mr
Chavez out of office.
The vitriol directed at Mr
Chavez belies the fact that his
policies have in reality been
moderate, according to Mr
Lander.
"There has been no real
redistribution of wealth, and
land reform has been very
timid," he says.
"There's been hardly any private
property confiscated... and
hardly any change in the tax
structure, apart from in the
attempt to collect taxes more.
There's been no real change but
a really dramatic change in
political culture - and this is
seen as extremely threatening."
Julia Buxton is a Venezuela
expert at Kingston University
who has just returned to the
country.
She agrees that Mr Chavez's
initiatives - such as his "missiones",
outreach programmes which aim to
improve health and education in
poor districts - have failed so
far to have much impact on
statistical indicators, but says
they have led "to a tremendous
sense of community".
Again, she says Mr Chavez's
persona is central to his
project.
"The amazing thing about the
Chavista [pro-Chavez] movement
is that they've got middle-class
people in there as well as the
working-class and marginal
people," she told BBC News
Online.
"But the only thing that's
holding them all together is
Chavez - and if he wasn't there
all of that would fragment...
[That makes] the whole of the
government incredibly
vulnerable."
This vulnerability led one of
the most outspoken members of
the opposition - former
President Carlos Andres Perez -
recently to suggest that Mr
Chavez should "die like a dog".
But Mike Gonzalez, a lecturer in
Hispanic Studies at Glasgow
University, says resorting to
violence would be "incredibly
dangerous" for the opposition.
"What would the impact of
assassination be, in a Venezuela
which has a long history of
social eruption? It could cause
absolute chaos," he told BBC
News Online.
"The opposition needs to defeat
Chavez [politically] - an
assassination would provoke a
crisis of the most extraordinary
proportions."
The opposition has its chance,
this Sunday, to exact that
political defeat - though
analysts warn that whatever the
outcome, Venezuela has a bumpy
ride ahead.
|