Controversial scientist claims ‘proof’ of toxicity of Monsanto products

January 31, 2014 (AFP) – A controversial French biologist, whose 2012 paper on the alleged dangers of pesticides was withdrawn, has published new claims that the chemicals were many times more toxic than advertised.

Gilles-Eric Seralini’s earlier work found that rats exposed to genetically modified maize and the pesticide Roundup developed tumours and other health problems, but his findings were questioned and his paper in the journal Food and Chemical Toxicology finally retracted after his study methods were found lacking.

He told AFP on Thursday that follow-up tests, this time using human cells, showed that Roundup and other pesticides that can be bought over the counter were “between two and 1,000 times more toxic than their main, active ingredient”.

This was problematic, said Seralini, as the toxicity of the active ingredient is what determines product guidelines for accepted exposure levels to the pesticide being used.

“There has been a miscalculation of the real toxicity of pesticides,” the professor said, claiming his research showed “cells begin to commit suicide” in petri dish experiments after exposure to the chemicals.

Seralini’s earlier paper was quashed after it prompted probes of pesticide safety by several national health agencies as well as the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).

The new study was published in the journal Biomed Research International, co-signed by two of Seralini’s colleagues at the University of Caen in France.

It tested three herbicides (Roundup, Matin El and Starane 200), three insecticides (Pirimor G, Confidor and Polysect Ultra), and three fungicides (Maronee, Opus and Eyetak).

Of the nine, eight “were several hundred times more toxic than their active principle,” the study said — and pointed to other “confidential” additions to the pesticide recipe.

Neither Roundup manufacturer Monsanto nor the EFSA could be reached for comment on Thursday.

The findings were welcomed by the French NGO Generations Futures (Future Generations), which demanded full disclosure of all the ingredients of pesticides.

costa rica news

ATTENTION: If you are seeing this message,


Subscribe via E-Mail

Get all of our news delivered fresh to your inbox every morning! Just tell us your name and where to send it using the form below.

PS – We hate spam too. We don’t sell or share our list with anyone, and we never send commercial email.

* = required field


Like us on Facebook and receive our news in your timeline

  • Douglas Hotchkiss

    alleged? – who doesnt think monsanto is dangerous by now? did some shill write this ?

    • kartashok

      Some mainstream illuminati puppet wrote it.

      • Douglas Hotchkiss

        indeed

  • Condor 13

    I will tell you a method of testing Genetically modyfied food and also pesticides:
    Give it daily to 200 million people for two years and see what happens.

    This is exactly what has been done, and there have been NO reported bad effects. On the contrary, life expectancy has gone up, and the cancer rate is down.

    How safe can you get ?